Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]I was keen to get your opinions on this image. I want to see how believable it is, given that I had to post-process it a little and deliberately shoot it with that in mind.
I haven't posted how I have done this just yet, but will give interested punters the chance to reverse engineer etc. I think this will give a nice little break from all this talk about filum and other ridiculous entities.... Also this would give some prelude to the post-processing workshop that Matt is going to organise. Comments welcomed as some would say, good, bad, fugly etc. Thanks for looking. Last edited by surenj on Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Explosive ChinookI think it's kind of cool... looks a little fake, but no worse than what I have seen in a lot of blockbuster movies. Well Done. I would be happy to be able to produce that PP
Re: Explosive ChinookI don't think "believable" is a word you will ever use with images like this. Nor should you have to though. There's nothing wrong with knowing that an image is a composite. Take Tanya Rochat for example, all of the parts of her composites are real, but you'd never think the finished image was ever real. That doesn't detract from the fact they're great images.
This looks like a screen grab from a game and that's not a bad thing. Well done!
Re: Explosive ChinookI think the image and the work done to get to that point are great. Is it believable? No. The reasons I say that are:
1. DOF doesn't appear consistent. 2. The reflection of the explosion on the front right of the helicopter doesn't make sense. 3. The explosions don't look real enough. Like I said, this is to answer the question of believability, not about the quality of the image produced, which is top notch. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Explosive ChinookCooool! It looks a little too clean....try placing some dry ice in the background, (or blow in some smoke), to add to the deception. Could make a big difference.
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Explosive Chinooknice concept suren, whilst I know reality is not what you are chasing, a few things come to mind, firstly the CH-47 is too clean, needs texture and some feathering/fog to blend it in more, the the aspect is what on earth is exploding? the helicopter has not hit yet a apache attack helio might have been a better choice...
The building on teh right is probably the best bit, it gives some depth to the image and leads teh viewer, i think more of this would help. This looks like the cover of a video game and hats off to you for that. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Explosive ChinookFYI
check this youtube video of a CH-47 ground resonance test, a oldie but a good one.. there is something satisfyign about seeing a good aviation machine being ripped apart by physics.. http://youtu.be/D2tHA7KmRME gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Explosive ChinookThanks for all your opinions. I have tried to take into account as much as possible what I thought was reasonable and make some changes....
I assumed that this was a last minute rescue mission before they made that place blow with air cover.....
I haven't bought one yet.... Most of them have the back part bare to save weight so looks naked. Might do a different version when I get one though. Does anyone have an Apache I could borrow for a few days?
Ta!
Done; In the dark room rather than real stuff as the physical living conditions don't necessarily permit such shanighans....Wish it did.
Fair call. Tried to correct this although I don't think I can fully correct now...
Sort of corrected...
Noted. Too much trouble to correct now as I shot that copter and explosions at the same time to avoid too much masking.
Ta!
Maybe compare the revision....
Re: Explosive ChinookRemake 1
Remake 2
Re: Explosive ChinookRemake #1 is a huge improvement. The chopper is much more realistic.
Re: Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]Your skills have improved dramatically, surenj.
Are you looking for a job in special effects? Good work!
Re: Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]Great work...that video that Gerry posted was a nice distraction as well!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]You have put in some time and skill, really well done. Loved both videos.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]reworks look heaps better Suren, the video is also neat, thats about 20 billion more layers than I have every used
This is a prime example where the final refinements are the key ones. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Explosive Chinook [now with BTS video]Thanks for the followup feedback.
For the record, I think it was very useful that I used a mostly non destructive technique as the suggestions on reflections etc were easy as clicking once to remove it. You can see me doing it in the video as per Patrick's suggestions. I think there is one more reflection that I forgot to dial down. The final file is more than 500Megs so became a PSB file. Its because of the smart layers and filters I assume. I have some ideas for the next version... Finally, this is the BTS lighting diargram. There is a LED desk lamp doing a bit of continuous lighting from the camera right (for the spinning rotors - while I held it down - this thing is violent when activated). The speedlite is doing a reflected number to bring out the camera left side generally without hotspots. As you can see, the explosions were already on my LCD monitor as the backdrop, saving me from doing masks to put it in later.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|