Photo stats

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Photo stats

Postby padey on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:08 pm

Hi guys,

I thought i'd show you some stats from three weddings that i'm currently getting printed. These starts are the ones we give to the clients, ie, no crap shots.

Three weddings, standard dark church, post photos outside and evening receptions. Our style is to stay as far away from flash as possible, to try and capture the ambient light.

ISO
Image

Aperture
Image

Focal length
Image
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:21 pm

Thanks Andrew,

I found the stats quiet interesting, can I ask what you used to compile them with ?

I found the aperture graph the most interesting, I would of expected around the f8 mark then was taken, but perhaps that is just my own shooting style / lenses I use.

It may be useful to list the lenses that you shot with, to put some of the stats in context a little more ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wmaburnett on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:42 pm

These are indeed very interesting, I think we all would learn a lot about our photography style if we compiled charts like this and reviewd them, would probably shock us too, but I think I probably get to the idea and never follow through on making the chart haha id just be playing with the pictures :lol: ,
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:13 pm

Personally, these stats are not surprising given that these are wedding shoots.

One would expect that without using flash (too much), you would need to open your aperture ( to maximise the available light) and you would always try to use the lowest ISO available (to reduce noise). Also, being that you can get in relatively close to the action, the focal length is right around the "commonly-ideal" portraiture focal lengths of 50 - 150mm.

It would be quite interesting to see our own graphs and what settings are typical to ourselves.

Padey, if you don't mind me asking, how did you work this graph out ? I assume you used a program that looks at the exif data and builds the graph for you ?
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby PiroStitch on Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:30 pm

Very interesting indeed :D Erm...600mm for a wedding shoot? :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby moz on Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:39 pm

I've used this:http://www.snapfiles.com/get/ExposurePlot.html or something similar to generate this graph (which I cut off on the long size, and those are "corrected" 35mm lengths, so 18mm is the short end of my 12-24 zoom):
Image
(it's only 10kB despite the on-screen site)
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby padey on Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:43 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Thanks Andrew,

I found the aperture graph the most interesting, I would of expected around the f8 mark then was taken, but perhaps that is just my own shooting style / lenses I use.

It may be useful to list the lenses that you shot with, to put some of the stats in context a little more ?


Your second question affects the first point. As a guide, for any dark church shots I use 28mm f1.4 and 85mm f1.4. My partner uses 85mm f1.2 and 135mm f2. DOF for the main isn't an issue, as most of the time the focus is on the bride and groom. The exception is in some of the fine art shots that we do.
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby padey on Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:08 pm

Aussie Dave wrote:Padey, if you don't mind me asking, how did you work this graph out ? I assume you used a program that looks at the exif data and builds the graph for you ?


Exif Viewer 2. It's a nice program that allows you to look at the meta-data of a particular shoot. Sometimes reasons for focal length/aperture/ISO are environmental and sometimes style.

In any case, it's good to see where we have room to grow in our style.
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby Greg B on Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:13 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:......interesting, I would of expected....


"would of" Craig??

Yellow card.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:22 pm

"Would have"


Guilty!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby BBJ on Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:26 pm

Very interesting Andrew, thanks for posting that and how is Gavin going? as i have not emailled him latey to see how things are going. Say to him for me.
Cheers
John
BBJ
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby padey on Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:03 pm

BBJ wrote:Very interesting Andrew, thanks for posting that and how is Gavin going? as i have not emailled him latey to see how things are going. Say to him for me.
Cheers
John
BBJ


Gav is going well. No sure how long ago you spoke to him, but he sold all his nikon/kodak kit and moved Canon; two 5Ds. He loves it and if leasing works out, I might follow him.

Apart from that he is busy as ever (2 weddings on this saturday) plus doing model shoots and the like.
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby BBJ on Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:14 pm

Hello Andrew, yes i know he was getting rid of all his Nikon/Kodak gear as i brought his 300m from him. Good he is enjoying the Canon gear and keeping busy.
Cheers
John
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby NikonUser on Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:03 pm

I just downloaded a copy of the Exposure Plot program... Very interesting!!

Although it tells me I have two shots at 1920mm..... Even my 500*1.4*1.5 (crop factor) only equals 1050. Hmmm I wish I had a lens that long!! :)

Paul
http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com

Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
User avatar
NikonUser
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
Location: Canberra - **D2X**


Return to General Discussion