Dead pixels???

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Dead pixels???

Postby Rainey on Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:00 am

I have just noticed after taking several night shots tonight that I have a few dead pixels (I assume) on my sensor. My camera is a Canon 350D and only about 5 weeks old, I wouldn't expect this to occur so early in its life. Is there anything that can be done about it, or should I just return the camera to the store and ask to exchange it for another one?

Image

Image
User avatar
Rainey
Member
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:02 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Postby Kyle on Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:27 am

How long was the exposure? They might have overheated, hence showing bright?
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Rainey on Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:32 am

They were 30 second exposures, I did a fair few of them tonight but even the first couple of shots that were only 5 - 8 seconds had the pixel on the right side. :cry:

If they overheat would they come right again?
User avatar
Rainey
Member
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:02 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Postby Rainey on Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:40 am

Hmmm okay I shot a couple at <1sec exposure and they are clear???

With another 30 second exposure of a dark room I get exactly the same pattern! Will warranty cover this? I've handled my camera with extreme care 100% of the time.
User avatar
Rainey
Member
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:02 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Postby whiz on Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:53 am

Doubt they'll do anything about hot pixels. Check your manual carefully and you may find mention of this phenomenon. My D70 had five of them. Only discovered it had some when I was doing long exposures.
I fully expect that my D200 has some too.
Almost any editing program will fix this, so don't go slashing your wrists just now.
People put way too much rubbish in signature blocks.


Image
whiz
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:28 pm
Location: Richardson, Canberra

Postby gstark on Fri Sep 01, 2006 8:14 am

Rainey,

This is not a major problem. I know you think otherwise at the moment, but ... :)

First of all, and as you've seen, it's only occurring with longer exposures. Thus it seems as though it may be heat related.

It may be that you can map the sensor in the camera's firmware; I'm not sure. I think we can do this in the Nikon's; I don't know about the Canon.

But importantly, it's only happening to one or two specific pixels. It's more an issue when you pixel peep, which is something that we all tend to do. The reality is that, when you're printing an image, you don't normally get to print at an individual pixel level, and thus the problem is masked.

Unless you're printing super large prints, you will never see the problem in any printed image, nor will this issue manifest itself in any real practical sense.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby ziggy on Fri Sep 01, 2006 8:52 am

I think the Canon 350 , unlike a 300 has a noise reduction feature in the menu somewhere. What that does is a dark frame subtraction for long exposures - ( I consider over say 4 seconds to be a long exposure for a digital sensor)

This behaviour is quite normal
ziggy
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:34 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Rainey on Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:19 am

Is that big group of hot pixels on the left hand side normal as well? I'm just almost sure it wasn't doing this last time I had the camera out, I've been over my last group of shots (the Lotus) and can't see any sign of it.

I know photoshop could easily fix the shots but I'm still a little disappointed, mainly with that big dot. I noticed on shorter exposures it just starts to turn purple as it 'heats' up?
User avatar
Rainey
Member
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:02 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania


Return to General Discussion