Sigma 17-70 backfocus?Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sigma 17-70 backfocus?Hey i just shot this and i was wondering if the experts can take a look at it
Shot at 70mm, F4.5, 1/125s What do you think, is it an issue? Thank you!
Re: Sigma 17-70 backfocus?
They'll be back in .... about three months. Can you wait?
My personal belief is that 99.9999% of so-called back-focus issues come down to just one cause - operator error. Usually that translates to poor technique, which might mean a poor understanding of how the camera works, or how it might work in a given situation. Ferinstance, I took my bright shiny new 30D out for a play last night - first time - and I'm not at all happy with the results. Focus is soft. Colours aren't how I like 'em. Exposure is all over the shop. I was shooting my D200 by its side, and results from that camera make an interesting comparison - super sharp, colour is great, exposure is where I like it .... What's really interesting is that at first glance (chimping only - I've not yet moved the images to a calibrated system) the super-high ISO images from the Canon seem to be noiser than those from the Nikon. Is any of this disappointing to me? Not in the slightest - it's an expected outcome. Until I learn the nuances of the Canon, and how to take advantage of its features (and I'm still at the bottom of a very steep learning curve with the D200, mind you) then this is exactly what I believe I should be seeing. I think that too many people take the learning curves for granted ..... But please feel free to disagree. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Well I had BF issues with my D70, consistently replicated using every which means of focus testing available at the time, so I'm less inclined to agree with Gary. Though I do believe half the cases of backfocus is down to user error.
In this case, going from the sample posted, it seems to be only ~10mm off from 'ideal', which is within tolerance IMHO. Plus the fact that you've tested it now, and are aware of it - means you can then compensate for it shooting in real situations.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|