Who has ordered a D3?Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
35 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who has ordered a D3?Who has ordered a D3?
Not I, as I don't want to be a eunuch just yet....
No seriously its very drool worthy, but I'd need to be making serious money from my images before I could justify the expense.
I'm still using the d70!
As much as I would love to get new gear, I think that I will be stuck with it until it dies. Hopefully that will be once the house is paid off and the kids have finished school so I can afford to get what I want. Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
Like new OS systems I wait until a product has a proven record of reliability. Will buy a D3 in the third quarter of 2008
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
The reserve bank just made my decision a lot easier. The bastards.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Have been tempted, I had a play with one @ Nikon Lidcombe........fantastic LCD quality, jumps out at you.
Can't justify the cost, I'll be getting the D300 though Cheers Marc I have my D2Xs here on Ebay, if anyone is interested. http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... :IT&ih=012
I'll probably be buying one. Hopefully.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Chris, sadly this seems to be the way to go... Oh, the wait Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
will be released the same time, although the longer primes might be hard to get if you're after them.
D300 for sure, when I have the scrilla..
Although I just got $2300 back from tax Already got me a 4GB Sandisk Extreme IV, and SB-800 is next!! Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Hi
Anyone is going to order through dslrforum? is poon going to stock d3? uuhm check my website>> http://www.6701.sunpixs.com
I've certainly had enough enquiries to suggest that people will be buying from Poon. It's simply a matter of waiting until he has stock. D300, hopefully very soon. D3 later. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Just note that at my workplace (Photo Continental), we have the D3 at around $7200. I don't know if we're going to do any price matching for it but we'll have to see...
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
I'm looking forward to picking up a D2xs with little use for $1800 Christmas 2008... but what would I know about economics...
oh. i'd love a d2xs. finding myself shooting at lower and lower iso levels... ohhh one would be nice... my d200 and d2xs (mmmm autofocus), that would be a nice combination. glass first though! body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
I shall wait before trading in the D2x, until the "first release bugs" are sorted (Firmware V1.2?) and the price comes down.
Grr! the wait! If only the D2x had the "noise free zone" that the D3 is reputed to have, the LCD screen, 2 x CF slots, double battery charger,HDMI, FF and live view...... then I would take it to the grave with me! Meanwhile, to occupy the waiting time, I got from ebay a new D2H body, sealed in the box with 1y USA warranty for $1K delivered. This will serve as a "sport / action / portrait shooter" and a back-up & 2nd body. (I hate lens changing, especially in the dusty conditions here) 9-10 months time, (D3Xs?) the plan is to sell both and upgrade maybe then comment: I am not convinced yet, except for the higher ISO values obtained noise free, that D2X to D3 is worth the upgrade, perhaps the D4 will have greater than 12Mp's?, self cleaning sensor?....... Anyway, have nearly a year to think about it!!
Not even the FF capabilities? Do you come from a film SLR background? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Not even the FF capabilities? Do you come from a film SLR background?
Hi! Gary, Err, not really, in those days I was "point & shoot", I have had FF Vs DX etc explained to me a few times, and read about it, and as yet do not fully understand the advantages, with FF what the lense sees is what you get?, not a cropped (x 1.5) version? Also something to do with saturation & resolution? On reflection, I was trying to say that with the results I am getting now (D2x) for the extra $'s I can't see the comparative value in the end product (pic quality). I am sure FF has an advantage, but I won't upgrade for awhile as said above. What do you see as the advantage of FF V's DX?
Unless and until you can use FF with the full scope of the glass available, it's difficult to appreciate. But a 24mm (my favourite film lens) reverts to being a 24mm lens.
Well, regardless of the crop factor, what the lens sees is what you get. It's just that, with a FF body and a lens to suit, you get to see more. I suspect that is what you were trying to say ...
If you're hapy with what you're getting now, then that's a most important factor, and should not be discounted. I'm very happy with the results I get from the D200; I'm still struggling to get acceptable out of camera results with the 30D. I should add that I try as much as possible to achieve satisfaction with minimal PP, btw. It should be good, in the camera. I don't anticipate getting either of the new Nikon bodies in the immediate short term. But that might change once I get my hands on one.
For me it's an intangible thing, and using glass like the Sigma 10-20 helps me to deal with what I find lacking in the DX format. But there is something about getting the full angle of view from any given lens that I love, but there's no way that I can express that in words. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I played with the D3 at last weeks AIPP T-day....it feels and looks like a winner
The high iso images look awesome from the back LCD when I zoomed in. I love the due card slot
For me, using the Nikkor 17-35 on both the D200 (1.5x crop) vs the f90x (FF film), I certainly appreciate the appeal of the new FF camera. For me, I don't often regret not having longer lenses. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
35 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|