Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Matty B on Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:26 pm
Thanks to Birddog I'm now the proud owner of the Nikkor 12- 24 DX lens.
I read either in Dpreview or another review that this lens is best not used with a polariser. Can't remember which review but I did read words to that effect. For the life of me I cannot see why not? Are there any 12 -24 shooters out there using a CPL on this lens? 
Shoot early - Shoot often
-

Matty B
- Member
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:22 am
- Location: Birregurra - Garden Paradise, Victoria
by gooseberry on Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:35 pm
You'll need to get a slim polariser otherwise you'll get some vignetting at the wider end (around 12mm). The good slim ones are the B+W slim or the Nikon CPL II.
-

gooseberry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
- Location: Singapore
by sirhc55 on Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:36 pm
Nope - but then again I have the Sigma 12-24mm and so far I have not found any need for a polariser. But I do have to admit to using nik efex polariser now and again 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Matty B on Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:41 pm
Thanks Gooseberry and Chris,
I really enjoy the deepened blue sky effect from a polariser so I'm keen to try one. I might have to research a little more as to vignetting. It's a bit pointless going to the expence of a super wide angle only to be reduced to 14mm or tighter just to serve my whimsy......
Cheers.
Shoot early - Shoot often
-

Matty B
- Member
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:22 am
- Location: Birregurra - Garden Paradise, Victoria
by birddog114 on Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:16 am
Matty B wrote:Thanks Gooseberry and Chris, I really enjoy the deepened blue sky effect from a polariser so I'm keen to try one. I might have to research a little more as to vignetting. It's a bit pointless going to the expence of a super wide angle only to be reduced to 14mm or tighter just to serve my whimsy......
Cheers.
Yes, I used the Super Pro 1 series CPL, same as UV, it's 3mm thin and it cost over $145.00 for a real thin 3mm Hoya or nearly $200 for a B&W 3 mm thin CPL
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by the foto fanatic on Tue Feb 22, 2005 8:28 am
Matty B
I have the 12-24 DX, also bought via Birddog  , and I have the standard Hoya CPF mounted on it. It cost about $80.00.
This filter appears to be about 7mm thick.
I just took a series of shots at 12mm and there is no vignetting.
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by stubbsy on Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:14 am
I did the same as cricketfan with the DX at the wetlands shoot. I also noticed no vignetting. I'll post a pic when I get a chance.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Matty B on Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:49 pm
Regular CPL and no vignetting .........Sounds like very good news to me. I see that the construction of the 12-24 DX focal module is different to the somewhat clumsy sliding affair in the Kit Lens. The thread apperas to set further back from the glass - no science there, just having a good look. Stubbsy, I'll look forward to seeing a 12mm frame with CPL - without Vig. !! Thanks Birddog, I was wondering if an ultra slim unit was avail. Maybe not required by the sounds of it? Thanks cricket fan and stubbsy. :wink:
Shoot early - Shoot often
-

Matty B
- Member
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:22 am
- Location: Birregurra - Garden Paradise, Victoria
by birddog114 on Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:57 pm
Matty B wrote:Regular CPL and no vignetting .........Sounds like very good news to me. I see that the construction of the 12-24 DX focal module is different to the somewhat clumsy sliding affair in the Kit Lens. The thread apperas to set further back from the glass - no science there, just having a good look. Stubbsy, I'll look forward to seeing a 12mm frame with CPL - without Vig. !! Thanks Birddog, I was wondering if an ultra slim unit was avail. Maybe not required by the sounds of it? Thanks cricket fan and stubbsy. :wink:
MattyB
That what I advised and told stubbsy to use first on his 12-24, IMHO, you don't need the slim one, but if monies are not an object, why not!
I have all slim UV and CPL for my Nikon gems some of them are B&W.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by stubbsy on Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:45 pm
Here's a shot at 14mm (no postable shots at 12 - will try again at the weeknd then update this post) with the 12-24 DX and a Hoya CPL to demonstrate the lack of vignetting. Click the image for a larger version. Aside from being resized in NC for web posting there has been NO PP on this image.

-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Matty B on Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:21 pm
Thanks Stubbsy, No vig here. I'd really be keen to see a 12mm frame with CPl if and when you have one to show me. Shall not commit to new filter until then!!
Shoot early - Shoot often
-

Matty B
- Member
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:22 am
- Location: Birregurra - Garden Paradise, Victoria
Return to General Discussion
|