Nikon. Pick me a lense please.Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Nikon. Pick me a lense please.Hi all,
I have the opportunity to purchase some of these lenses off a family member. Nikon AF-D 20mm f2.8 Nikon AF-D 35-70mm f2.8 Nikon AF-D 50mm f1.8 Nikon AF-D 24-85mm f2.8-4 Sigma EX 24-70mm f2.8 If I had to pick two which two would it be? and why? Note due to budget restrictions the Sigma is there ... is it a good lense? I am having trouble finding quality reviews of it.
Here you go:
Nikon AF-D 35-70mm f2.8 Nikon AF-D 50mm f1.8 The rest are paperweight Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Thank you,
I really don't know how you do it, answer all these threads that is. You are a miracle worker. I will take your advice. I have heard lots of good things about the 50mm F1.8 but wasn't sure about the rest. When I come into some funds I will place my order for my 70-200VR Regards Luke
yraen69 - try this for pics with the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/2470_28_ex_dg_asp_df Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Some great shots from that sigma If my budget get's really tight I might have to consider it. I am partial to nikon glass however. Thank you for sharing those. some great photo's, really puts thing in perspective.
I thought the 20mm would be an ok lense, but I am going with Birddog on this one, I'm not touching it.
Re: Nikon. Pick me a lense please.
I think it'd also depend on the lens you already own. Unfortunately I haven't used any of them so I can't really tell... But this 20mm F/2.8 looks good on paper! Link.
If you're into wide angle and you can get a good price on the 20mm/2.8 I'd get it. The 50/1.8 is a great lens, but is so cheap you can buy it new, not much saving in getting it second hand. The list price for the 20/2.8 is over $1K, so if you can get it at a good price, I'd go with it.
For a D70 user I would go with Birddys view, but as gooseberry said the 20 2.8 is an expensive lens. I have it, but have only stuck it on the D70 once, due to the kit covering that length and it isn't really a wide anymore, so not a useful length for the money on a digital body. Mind you in 2010 when a FF body comes out, I'll already have a wide angle. If they are really cheap, and it would not be using a situation, buy the 20 and resell it. Still get $400-$600 S/H. The 50mm 1.8 is $200 new.
Edit You know none of these fit on a *ist DS?
The 20/2.8 is around $600.00/ 35-70 is $900.00 Aussie Plastic. The 20/2.8 is not so good in DSLR and is not my choice, on FF maybe it has the place to stand. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
The 20mm was used on a nikon F5. I actually liked it when used in conjunction with that wonderful camera. Stuck on a D70 I don't think it would do allot for me, 30mm isn't all that useful not wide enough when you want wide and to short when what you really want is 50mm.
I could buy it and sell again, but my finanaces really are streched tight at the momment. I think the 50mm, 35-70 are as Birdy says the way to go. thanks for the feedback everyone.
Hi
Hi I am intereted in the 20mm. How much is it going for? I am thinking of using it as a reverse macro lens. regards, Arthur
Hmm not sure if I can arrange that, the lense's are from a family member, both myself and another friend of mine have the oppurtunity to purchase them, with the condition I get first dip.
The family member is older and I think would prefer I didn't buy the lenses off him and then on sell them. Thats just my feeling on the matter. I was only half serious in my last post. Sorry about that.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|