anyone done studio based photography....advice needed

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

anyone done studio based photography....advice needed

Postby redline on Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:41 pm

well i just got the basics down in class yeterday with contiuous lighting - tungsen and flash.
does anyone have any exp. using a projector to display a bg on the wall to shoot your subject with?
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:43 pm

I've wanted to do it, but never have. You might have to set a bit of distance between the subject and the background and then simulate similar lighting to achieve the effect you want.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby MHD on Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:47 pm

me too... Always wanted to do it but just havent...

We've got an art room at college I might set up as a basic studio... might go get some lights etc...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby gstark on Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:48 pm

It's not something that I've tried either.

However, you need to carefully balance your lighting; if you're using strobes, they will be likely to greatly overpower whatever you're using for your background illumination. Also, you'd need to ensure that none of your subject lighting spills over onto the background; this would be detrimental to your desired target image.

I would imagine that colour balance could be an issue too; what we think we see in real life has a great deal of compensation applied by the way that our eyes and brain interpret what we're seeing.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby redline on Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:52 pm

heres what i was thinking of
Image

i don't know if my lenses are going to be able to focus this close.



but i don't want to do this outdoors cos i dont want to be arrested for carrying a weapon in public
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby leek on Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:09 pm

Just a thought, but why not shoot the subject/person in the studio (against a high contrast and/or brightly lit background) and then photoshop the background in in PP...

Not sure if it would look more convincing than a projected background, but it might be worth a comparison...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby redline on Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:17 pm

i did think of that but i wanted to avoid using pp as much, just as a last resort if all eles fails.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby JordanP on Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:05 pm

This may not be helpful in the short term but Nulab have been running heaps of seminars on this type of work lately. I think they are even selling videos of the conference but its pretty $$$pricey$$$ from memory.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby gstark on Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:26 pm

Nulab?

Pricey ?

Surely not?


:lol:
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby JordanP on Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:41 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

hey, but for professional printing I don't find them too bad :wink:
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby kipper on Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:09 pm

JordanP I was at NuLabs on Monday and yes, they were advertising it a lot it.

They call it VirtualBackground, think Kodak are the company behind it. They had a whole stand there about it.

All it is, from what I can see is using as was said before I high contrast background (eg. blue screen) and have the subject stand in front of this and then super impose that onto a background. I think it was the fact they probably had a library of every background you could possibly think of. Plus they might do some other things such as ensuring that the subjects shadow interacts with the scene correctly and vice versa. Not too hard to do with some single high contrast colored props in the studio for the shadows to cast onto. That way you can get the shadows into Photoshop. There are probably some other ways using programs such as 3DStudio, LW or Maya to also superimpose studio work onto a virtual background.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK


Return to General Discussion