Sony A55 and A33.. surprisingly good LOL

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sony A55 and A33.. surprisingly good LOL

Postby photomarcs on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:43 am

Canon | Sony | Panasonic | Tamron | Sigma
My photography is still developing.
Don't be so negative!
http://www.photomarcs.com
User avatar
photomarcs
Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Liverpool, Sydney Australia

Re: Sony A55 and A33.. surprisingly good LOL

Postby gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:53 am

As it happens, there's a Sony event later today. I'm hoping to have a play with some new toys.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Sony A55 and A33.. surprisingly good LOL

Postby surenj on Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:51 am

Wow looks good on paper.

They are catching up. Just need better Better sensors + ergonomics + better lenses. I Reckon in a few years we will be talking whether to buy Nikon, Canon or a Sony... OR maybe we are already doing that.... :wink:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Sony A55 and A33.. surprisingly good LOL

Postby gstark on Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:45 pm

OK, just back from Sony.

Had a play with both bodies, and they've also announced pricing for the NEX-VG10. At $3499 it's still significantly cheaper than anything that's pro level, but ...


The A33 and A55 feel very nice and solid. very high quality construction, and something that, given the pricepoints these are coming in at, seems to be very good value.

And the Zeiss lens was an order of magnitude better again. :)

I'm unconvinced about the digital viewfinders. Why bother with the translucent mirrors if you're using electronic viewfinders anyway? I'm also concerned about the effect upon image quality that shooting your image through the mirror may have: it's another layer of glass, and one that can and will get dirty.

And the blackout time seemed a tad high; much higher than on mirrored camera with an optical viewfinder.

These are first impressions, based upon a five-minute hands-on; didn't have a chance to look at images, so we shall wait until I can get a body for a more comprehensive review.

It's going to be very interesting comparing these two bodies - and the NEX-VG10 - with the D3100.

I'm just waiting for the Canon announcements now ... :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Sony A55 and A33.. surprisingly good LOL

Postby aim54x on Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:19 pm

Sony is planning a launch of some sort at the Riesel later this month...it may be the official retail launch of these units.

I guess you will be mirror cleaning rather than sensor cleaning on the A33 and A55
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney


Return to General Discussion