Big Day Out Competition

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Big Day Out Competition

Postby gstark on Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:35 am

Ah yes. Check the terms and conditions before you enter ...

I'm glad to see that somebody has.

Let's hear it for exploitation.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Big Day Out Competition

Postby lightning on Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:16 am

I sense an opportunity to cause CHAOS here!!!
Imagine 100 photographers taking photos of large groups of people who would then ALL be asked to sign a modeling waiver form, while the bands are playing!!! :P :biglaugh:
1 shot out of focus is a mistake, 10 shots out of focus is an experiment,
100 shots out of focus is a style!, anonymous.
User avatar
lightning
Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 10:47 am
Location: Wellington NZ

Re: Big Day Out Competition

Postby Murray Foote on Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:00 pm

Extraordinary.

You won't hear any music after the first couple of bars because of the thousands of people besieging the stage to get the musicians to sign consent forms. Then there's the great surging crowd trying to get security guards to sign consent forms of their dramatic battle images of those guards in front of the stage trying to impede the crowds invading the stage for their signatures, even while the battle continues.

I can only think they need such rigorous measures because they have some scheme in mind such as they want to use the winning entry as a background in a tobacco ad showing Tony Abbot solo line dancing nude in an Indonesian slaughter house. (... or has that become normal?)

The only good thing about this is that they're not banning photography. You take your 600mm lens along and show the gatekeepers the entry form, saying I'm here to take photographs at the request of the organisers. You just don't enter the competition.
User avatar
Murray Foote
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
Location: Ainslie, Canberra

Re: Big Day Out Competition

Postby Steffen on Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:35 pm

I believe this:

The Entrant warrants that any person depicted in their photographic entry, has granted permission to be portrayed in the photograph.


is not of any consequence, since (as we've all learned from numerous discussions and submissions about photographers' rights over the last few years) you do not need people's permission for them to be portrayed in photographs. What you do need their consent for is commercial use of their image. If a photograph simply enters and wins a photography competition then that doesn't count as commercial use. If you (or the BDO organisers you signed your rights over to) wanted to use the photograph to promote the event or any other merchandise then that would be commercial use and require model releases.

However, this purpose is merely hypothetical to you as the photographer and competition participant because BDO have not stated that they will use the photographs commercially. They've only asked you to sign over the copyright to them. It should be up to them, at the point in time they make the decision to use the photograph commercially, to obtain the necessary permissions.

In short, this sounds like trouble, I'd give it a wide berth ;)

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Re: Big Day Out Competition

Postby Murray Foote on Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:40 pm

Big Day Out wrote:the Promoter ... [can] ... license, communicate, modify and otherwise exploit the Entry


While it's hard to imagine they really intend to commercially exploit the image, I interpret those words to say they have given themselves permission to do so. I think requiring evidence of permission is also equivalent to requiring a model release although the demand is clearly absurd. It's hard to imagine a court would support them if they really did go down that line, though.
User avatar
Murray Foote
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:31 pm
Location: Ainslie, Canberra

Re: Big Day Out Competition

Postby Reschsmooth on Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:25 pm

I think the point is that the organizers are not going to be held liable for any images for which the photographer has not been granted permission. Hardly mischievous. The other clauses are problematic.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to General Discussion