NEF reviewing in camera

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

NEF reviewing in camera

Postby darb on Mon May 23, 2005 6:31 pm

hi all

when reviewing NEF's on my little LCD sceren, they seem to be quite bright, saturation quite high and generally images look quite nice ... brightness is set to -1 ... anyway, when i import into CS / ACR or even Nikon Capture editor, they are much darker and require substantial boosting etc.

Any idea why things may be looking so pretty on the viewfinder, but not when the NEF is pulled into software?
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby kipper on Mon May 23, 2005 6:45 pm

Because the LCD sucks for reviewing images, well that's what I've found anyway. You have it at certain angles and it looks bright, other angles dark. Take it home and it looks totally different to what you expected. Wouldn't be bad if they had a larger viewfinder, and some how lockout the mirrored image from the lens and project the image from the CF onto the viewfinder. Atleast that'd stop issues with light reflecting off the LCD.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby big pix on Mon May 23, 2005 6:50 pm

have you had your screen at home profiled......this would be a good starting point and camera back to default, then play to get color management between camera and screen

cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby MattC on Mon May 23, 2005 7:01 pm

Mine is set to -3 and is fairly reasonable, although I do not expect much in the way of accuracy, especially when I get outdoors into the sun. Generally, I only use it for the histogram and highlights screens.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby darb on Mon May 23, 2005 7:21 pm

yeah cheers, i know not to rely on it, and i use the histogram mostly... my screens at work, home etc are all very close to one another ... just thought id ask.
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby johndec on Mon May 23, 2005 7:27 pm

I dont even really look at the review picture, as I know it bears little resemblance to reality. I look at the histogram only as it at least gives some idea of exposure.
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....


Return to General Discussion