Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by wendellt on Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:19 pm
Hi everyone
Anybody got example images taken with a Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8
you can do 100% crops of images if you like because i would like to see the image quality produced by that lens
I would also like to see image examples of what a Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 can produce

-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Glen on Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:27 pm
Wendell, have changed your heading and text to 28-70 as the 28-80 is not 2.8 and not comparable with the 17-55 (also changed as not right, no 35-55). Your pics show 17-55 and 28-70, both 2.8 so have changed to reflect that, otherwise you may get no replies for lenses which don't exist 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by birddog114 on Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:35 pm
wendellt,
The only thing can do the image comparison and image quality on these lens is come to the mini meet, put the lenses on the camera, take photo with it, go home with the CF card and play it yourself.
These are two Nikon gems and they ain't cheap + not so many people have these lenses in their hand.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by MCWB on Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:39 pm
Wendell: why not come to a mini-meet and try them out? Both are great lenses, but you certainly pay for it.  There is a nice review thread here on the 17-55 DX started by JordanP, and Birdy has the both, but I doubt web-size jpgs are really going to do them justice.
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by wendellt on Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:49 pm
Glen wrote:Wendell, have changed your heading and text to 28-70 as the 28-80 is not 2.8 and not comparable with the 17-55 (also changed as not right, no 35-55). Your pics show 17-55 and 28-70, both 2.8 so have changed to reflect that, otherwise you may get no replies for lenses which don't exist 
thanks Glen, I have lost my concentration due to extreme anticipation for my new camera...
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by wendellt on Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:51 pm
MCWB wrote:Wendell: why not come to a mini-meet and try them out? Both are great lenses, but you certainly pay for it.  There is a nice review thread here on the 17-55 DX started by JordanP, and Birdy has the both, but I doubt web-size jpgs are really going to do them justice.
Hi MCWB
I know web sized jpegs wont do them justice but even a 5cm crop at 100% and saved as jpeg 61% should give me a general idea, I will go to the minimeet, I was just interested in seeing if anybody had examples on hand
great image of the week by the way!
thankyou
Birddog I will be at the minimeet this saturday
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Nnnnsic on Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:40 pm
Glen wrote:...you may get no replies for lenses which don't exist 
I was convinced that I had a 28-80 sitting in my photography cabinet that I got as the kit lens from my old F60.
It's a heap of junk... but hey... it's still a 28-80!
(Yes, I know... it's not a 2.8...)
-

Nnnnsic
- I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
-
- Posts: 7770
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
- Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
-
by Glen on Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:35 pm
Well picked Leigh, I wasn't sure it existed either but checked and there were three versions a D, DN & G. The D's are all 3.5- 5.6, the G 3.3 -5.6.
Wendell, this link goes to Lens review sites, it is the first post by me on the page, will give you a few opinions on these lenses. Sorry don't have either myself (but would love to). http://www.d70users.com/viewforum.php?f ... ffd563cc21
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by wendellt on Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:41 pm
thanks for the leads glen I am leaning towards the 28-80 because of it's build quality and further reach[/quote]
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Nnnnsic on Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:52 pm
You mean the 28-70.
The 28-80 is a piece of crap. It's a nice piece of crap, but a piece of crap nonetheless.
And I've just wasted my 2000th post telling everyone what a piece of crap the 28-80 is.
It's better than the 70-300G!!!
But not by much... because... it's a piece of crap.
-

Nnnnsic
- I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
-
- Posts: 7770
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
- Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
-
by MCWB on Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:26 pm
wendellt wrote:I am leaning towards the 28-80 because of it's build quality and further reach
One thing you haven't mentioned is this: what are you going to be using this lens for mostly?
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by birddog114 on Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:12 pm
wendellt,
Are you going to use the 28-80 on your D2x  I thought you meant the 28-70.
I also wonder: what are you going to use it for? I mean in photography with your top notch body.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by wendellt on Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:59 pm
One thing you haven't mentioned is this: what are you going to be using this lens for mostly?
Hi MCWB it's going to be my main lens, so i can take pictures of architecture and architectural interiors, wide shots in low lit spaces and details shots of architectural features, i love cathedrals, baroque/rococo architecture and all the modern monuments. I can also use the lens for future portraiture. It will be a travelling lens so it has to be well built because it will take a few knocks Leigh i always make mistakes i meant 28-70mm [/quote]
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by birddog114 on Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:10 pm
wendellt,
Leigh i always make mistakes i meant 28-70mm
I'm sure you're the second member (I have one) on this board has this lens if you or I can source one for you.
It become rare and you gotta love it.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Onyx on Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:28 am
-

Onyx
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
- Location: westsyd.nsw.au
-
Return to General Discussion
|