What is your preference for photo resolution?Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
What is your preference for photo resolution?Just doing a poll because I have a widescreen notebook with a resolution of 1680x1050 (max. of 2048x1536). Although I prefer viewing pictures at this resolution, I know not everybody elses' computers are the same.
If our resolution varies so much, then what should be the standard resolution for photos? Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
-------------------------------------------------- Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ] -------------------------------------------------- "Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
Re: What is your preference for photo resolution?sorry Informer, I'm not quite following you.
Do you mean what resolution do we have our monitors set to, or what resolution do we set our photos up for (to post on the forum) ?? For me, monitor = 1280 x 1024 (19" CRT Monitor) photos - roughly 800-900px along longest side (I believe the forum prefers images about 800px along longest side). Sometimes with frames, mine are a little longer Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Re: What is your preference for photo resolution?
At first I was going to say monitor resolution, but decided on preferred image resolution regardless of what monitor resolution you have. Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
-------------------------------------------------- Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ] -------------------------------------------------- "Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
Thanks to those who responded.
The reason why I asked was because I find images (especially mine) better and nicer to look at when they're large, at least to my resolution. Just wondering whether you guys prefer looking at something large and in your fact, or something compact and sharp looking? I discovered this when I was posting images to photo galleries, a lot of them would only accept pictures no bigger than 800x600 and sometimes even only 640x480. Hell some PDAs support these functions so I think its time to up the pixel counts a bit more and make it 1024x768. I think I will change my photos to this resolution if enough people supports it. Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
-------------------------------------------------- Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ] -------------------------------------------------- "Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
I chose 800x600 simply because my Laptop only goes to 1024x768 and photos that large will be lost to view.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Well unfortunately those well off enough to afford big monitor real estate still have to cater to the lowest common denominator, which means assuming the viewer has 800x600 res screen. There's a reason most sites place a restriction on max image size - when resolution grows filesizes grow exponentially (lowest common factor again - the dialup user, hence try to keep filesize below 100kb).
In this forum, because of the left hand column taking up a bit of space, 600 pixels wide is probably a good limit to try and stay under.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|