All D3 Rumours in one place

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Postby Killakoala on Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:59 pm

gstark wrote:Just thinking aloud ....

Shouldn't a smaller number of photosites also have a minor but beneficial effect on the vignetting we see on FF sensors?


Replying (typing) out aloud.

I am thinking that if we had, say a 12MP APS-C sensor and then it was enlarged to be a 35mm FF sensor still at 12MP then the photosites would be larger and would have a reduction of the vignetting that the photosites on the FF sensor might otherwise encounter. (Although that would depend on the depth of the photosite.)

If however, the photosites remained the same size, this would allow more photosites to be fitted onto the sensor, then we might get photosite vignetting on the periphery of the sensor. To prevent this individual lenses might need to be placed over the photosite, which will add complexity and cost to production.

Vignetting of lenses on a large photosite FF sensor would be more likely similar to what we get with 35mm Film SLRs. However technological advances will probably compensate for that as it is a known issue and i am sure is being tackled by CCD and CMOS manufacturers.

We will just have to wait and see what Nikon and Canon have in store for the next generation CCDs, CMOSs or JFETS (or whatever new technology they come up with.)

It's confusing..
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:28 pm

Steve,

Killakoala wrote:I am thinking that if we had, say a 12MP APS-C sensor and then it was enlarged to be a 35mm FF sensor still at 12MP then the photosites would be larger and would have a reduction of the vignetting that the photosites on the FF sensor might otherwise encounter. (Although that would depend on the depth of the photosite.)


That's a very interesting point.

Consider that the production of silicon is a largely photographic process. Once they have a working design, it's usually produced at a given size, which, of course, is a part of the design brief.

But what if they left the design as it was, and simply used a different magnification factor to convert an APS sized sensor into a FF one?

Less chips per wafer, of course, but that's a given. Everything else you've stated becomes true, and the underlying design and associated development costs take on a whole new life.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:20 pm

I wonder if it would be easier to produce a larger photosite.

Now then, Nikon manufactures machines that make CCDs and CMOSs. Surely that would be a market advantage for them.

It is certainly interesting from a technical POV to see where the technology is heading.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:01 am

Thursday 23rd August 1pm Japan time :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Steffen on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:10 am

Today??? Or 2012? ;)

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby iposiniditos on Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:12 am

Steffen wrote:Today??? Or 2012? ;)

Cheers
Steffen.


2012??

Are we so close???

:D
Theodoros Chliapas
www.tchliapas.com

Arf she said...
User avatar
iposiniditos
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:33 am
Location: Kozani, Greece

Postby gooseberry on Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:37 pm

No need to wait till then, can see the new cam here :lol:

I like the inspiration dial (can dial it up if you lack any, and if you have too much inspiration, you can dial a negative value ! - though I don't like the body styling) :lol:

http://i17.tinypic.com/6cyqf68.jpg
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:38 pm

gooseberry wrote:No need to wait till then, can see the new cam here :lol:

I like the inspiration dial (can dial it up if you lack any, and if you have too much inspiration, you can dial a negative value ! - though I don't like the body styling) :lol:

http://i17.tinypic.com/6cyqf68.jpg


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby iluxa on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:05 pm

Ok, 23/08/07, 5mins past 1PM Tokyo time. Still nothing about D3... 8)
User avatar
iluxa
Member
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Waitara, Sydney, NSW

Postby gooseberry on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:06 pm

Out at dpreview already...
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby antman on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:06 pm

Geoff C

My Gallery:http://geoffc.smugmug.com/
User avatar
antman
Member
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Frenchs Forest, Sydney

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:08 pm

Look on DPR
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby iluxa on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:10 pm

Damn Internet Explorer cache!!!! :evil:
Thanks guys!!!
User avatar
iluxa
Member
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Waitara, Sydney, NSW

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:12 pm

12.1MP, FF, 11FPS, ISO to 25600 ....

Hmmmm

Still reading
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Thommo on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:13 pm

User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby Steffen on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:24 pm

gstark wrote:12.1MP, FF, 11FPS, ISO to 25600 ....


Most impressive for me so far: fine-tune adjustment for AF (yay!) and 920,000 pixel LCD.

A lot of the good stuff seems to be in the D300 as well.

I'm switching to Nikon!

Cheers
Steffen. PS: forgot the obligatory question - will Poon have stock on 1st November? :lol: :lol: :lol:
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Thommo on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:26 pm

both are great cameras. but something i cant get out of my mind... is the d3 aimed towards sports shooters as well as other pro's. if it is aimed at sports isnt it a little pointless having FF in a sports camera, even with the crop mode. Or are nikon just trying to cover all bases ATM
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby olrac on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:32 pm

So when will poon have these camera's and Lenses in stock? hahahahaha

I hope that there will be at least some stock avalible within 6 months...
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:37 pm

A lot of digesting to do, I'm not considering buying either buy I'm glad the cat is out of the bag.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby losfp on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:38 pm

I reckon the D3 is a high-speed camera, designed to offer fast shooting, at extremely high ISO.

You'd think they would follow up with a D3X or similar in about 6-12 months time.

Have a look at the D40 -> D40x

With the specs and price, I think it's clear they are targetting the 1d mk III as a competitor, NOT the 1Ds mk III

I want one :)
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:39 pm

Steffen wrote:PS: forgot the obligatory question - will Poon have stock on 1st November? :lol: :lol: :lol:


The real question is whether Nikon will have any stock on that date. :)

A couple of other nice features ... networked cameras .... dual CF slots ... live view .... HDMI .....

but no interchangeable screens.

No mention of multi-exposure modes, which, if dropped, would be a step backwards IMHO.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:39 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:A lot of digesting to do, I'm not considering buying either buy I'm glad the cat is out of the bag.


I leave it to you, Craig, to start the D3x rumour mill! :lol: :lol: Gotta start somewhere, and people seem to get very excited with rumours.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:42 pm

I'm excited about the new lenses more, especialy the two fast zooms.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby blackD200 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:43 pm

24-70mm f2.8 bugger --> would have been a slightly better option than the 28-70 f2.8 ... I only say this a I just recently bought a 28-70mm. Had this been out a couple of weeks ago, I may have considered waiting...

:D still extremely happy with the 28-70...

hmmmmm D3... me cant afford yet... would have to scrifice both D200 and then some to even touch that...

anywaysl its about time Mr. Nikon...
blackD200
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Hills District

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:43 pm

sirhc55 wrote:Thursday 23rd August 1pm Japan time :wink:


It would appear that this time I was right :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby olrac on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:45 pm

The lenses are of more benifit to me than the bodies too

I just sold my 17 - 55 to get a 17 - 35 but I think I will now get a 14 - 24 that will nicely compliment my 28 - 70

one thing I am not too sure about though is the integrated lens hood could make any filter attachments very difficult.
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC

Postby iluxa on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:49 pm

Definitely love D300. Cannot wait to switch from D70 to it. :D

Well, Nikon did a big step again and will stay firmly on the market.
User avatar
iluxa
Member
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Waitara, Sydney, NSW

Postby losfp on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:49 pm

olrac wrote:one thing I am not too sure about though is the integrated lens hood could make any filter attachments very difficult.


Just looking at the pics of that lens - I reckon it will be IMPOSSIBLE to attach a filter without breaking it or the front element :)
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby ATJ on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:51 pm

I'm glad I waited on getting a D200. I think a D300 will be much nicer. :)
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:52 pm

Looks great! Doesn't mean I'm going to dump Canon and go back to Nikon though :evil: Wish I could but here's hoping Canon will learn how to build an ergonomic camera now
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby chrisk on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:54 pm

losfp wrote:I reckon the D3 is a high-speed camera, designed to offer fast shooting, at extremely high ISO.

You'd think they would follow up with a D3X or similar in about 6-12 months time.

Have a look at the D40 -> D40x

With the specs and price, I think it's clear they are targetting the 1d mk III as a competitor, NOT the 1Ds mk III

I want one :)


i agree. cant compete with the 1Ds with only 12mp.

the d300 looks very appealing to me in the long term. live view, 930k LCD, 51AF points. if they can get the iso right then this is a killer slr.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Yi-P on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:55 pm

Oh my oh my.... This is sure a battle between the two grounds!!

I now want a D3!! :evil: :evil:

The 12.1MP is bit on the side against the 22MP 1DsMk3 on the Canon, but can't wait to see its high ISO performance at ISO 25,600!!! :!:
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:56 pm

One other very nice feature ... AF calibration.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Laurie on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:57 pm

D300 FTW
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:57 pm

Ok .....


Here's the killer question.

Hands up those who think that either of these cameras will make them a better photographer?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:01 pm

gstark wrote:Ok .....


Here's the killer question.

Hands up those who think that either of these cameras will make them a better photographer?


Well all my photos now look worse than they did yesterday, cause there's a better camera out, y'see!
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby moz on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:02 pm

http://press.nikonusa.com/ and http://www.dpreview.com/ have details of the new cameras.

Plus it looks as though they're really taking on Canon in the long lenses - 500 and 600mm f/4 lenses! This is quite exciting for us Canon users, it looks as though Canon will have to lift their game. The new D3 has most of the features of the Canon pro cameras with a couple of areas where it's probably better - high ISO and more pixels on the LCD so live focus will hopefully be more usable. With such big pixels it will hopefully have decent noise performance at any ISO, and even the 256k ISO should be usable.

Now we just have to hope they become available sooner than Nikons usual performance. This year, say.
Last edited by moz on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby chrisk on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:03 pm

gstark wrote:One other very nice feature ... AF calibration.


what does that mean ?
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Alex on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:03 pm

Great news! It was certainly worth the wait.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:05 pm

WOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO............my prayers are answered............ :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Laurie on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:05 pm

Gary, Does Poon have these in stock? I WANT ONE!!! :P

kidding
(but I want one)
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:06 pm

Rooz wrote:
gstark wrote:One other very nice feature ... AF calibration.


what does that mean ?


You can calibrate your AF system to match up to 20 lenses.

That should shut up those who complain of back-focus. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:07 pm

Cre8tivepixels wrote:WOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO............my prayers are answered............ :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D


If only mine would be. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:08 pm

I wonder if any of these address what Andrew (Padey) jumped ship for, if so then it was rather bad timing (but we still have to see real units delievered in a timely fashion) lets hope Nikon have upped there game.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby rooboy on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:08 pm

gstark wrote:Ok .....


Here's the killer question.

Hands up those who think that either of these cameras will make them a better photographer?


I'll bite :)

It wouldn't make me a better photographer, but it would make my prints better (just like going from a D70 to a D200 improved the quality of my prints). :P
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby gooseberry on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:09 pm

Another thing mentioned in the press release is "self-cleaning sensor unit"
Last edited by gooseberry on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:09 pm

At least the two new zoom lenses are not DX.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Underload on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:11 pm

I didn't really follow the release of the D200, and the slow way that stock was made available - but it might be better this time round, given it is Nikon Aus, rather than Maxwells?
D200 + stuff
User avatar
Underload
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:32 am
Location: Brisbane Northside

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:12 pm

I wonder how long until we see some sample images from both the D3 and the D300.

As an aside, why wouldn't they offer ISO 100 on there top of the line camera ?? Just a sensor limitation ? Or perhaps the 24MP FF D3x will have it ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby losfp on Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:13 pm

gstark wrote:Ok .....


Here's the killer question.

Hands up those who think that either of these cameras will make them a better photographer?


Oh Gary Gary Gary...

Haven't you realised that all the real photographers are out there taking photos and the only people on here right now are all the lost-case gear-whores? ;)
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

cron