biggerry wrote:ohh dear.
DSLRUsers forum' all members' dinner/BBQModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Re: DSLRUsers forum' all members' dinner/BBQ
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: DSLRUsers forum' all members' dinner/BBQ
Ahh - I was wondering if that was the underexposed shot I saw - you've done remarkably well to PP it into this shape D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
Re: DSLRUsers forum' all members' dinner/BBQ
in hindsight, i found even with the underexpose the red colours actually came back looking much nicer and natural than the subsequent images, the shots after that one all had blown highlights in the red making for that shitty yellow colour which was not what it looked like. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: DSLRUsers forum' all members' dinner/BBQAre the pixels blown due to length of exposure or just stuffed Gerry? Either way ...bummer.
Knarly pic by the way. Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: DSLRUsers forum' all members' dinner/BBQ
not blown, under exposed to the max gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
|