Birddog114 wrote:They lost lot of business in the past years, since the internet shopping age was popular, 60% of the gears which Nikon users in Down Under came from difference source overseas.
Well...
In my hands at the moment, just collected from the bedroom where my wife and I have been discussing, are print outs of the following:
Nikon D200 info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon D200 review (all of it) from DPreview site
Nikon 18-200VR review from Ken Rockwell site
Nikon 24-120 AF-S VR info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon 12-24 AF-S DX info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon 50mm f1.4 info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon 105mm f2.8 micro info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon 200-400 f4 VR info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon 80-400 f4.5 - 5.6 VR info and specs from Maxwell site
Nikon TC-17E II info and specs from Maxwell site
Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma APO Macro 150 f2.8 EX DG details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma Macro 105mm f2.8 EX DG details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma APO 70-200 f2.8 EX DG HSM details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma APO 80-400 f4.5 - 5.6 EX OS details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma APO 120-300 f2.8 EX IF HSM details from Sigmaphoto site
Sigma 18-50 f2.8 EX DC details from Sigmaphoto site
And a number of other print outs not worth mentioning.
All printed in pretty colour. We were in great discussion about how I need a D200 and how she needs to give the frustrations of the Olympus C770 away and take the D70 from me.
We had
agreed that far, and were in the process of deciding what lenses we should get.
I was going to get a Nikon 18-200 VR for her everyday lens on the D70 and will keep the 18-70 kit lens from that for me. We were also planning on -
the Nikon 50mm f1.4,
Nikon 80-400 VR (or maybe the Sigma equiv. if as good),
Nikon or Sigma 105 f2.8 micro,
and eventually a 12-24 and a teleconverter of some sort.
Then when the need arose, I would scrap the kit lens and either get another 18-200 VR for me, or go for a lens that would offer F2.8 across a range, say the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 or maybe a 70-200 VR. A bit of thought was still needed there to decide what I will be taking and where I will have most need for wide aperture before finishing the "shopping list" on that score.
Well now all that is off the boil.
Wife has said if we need to pay to have our camera fixed, then that's IT. That means no D200, no new lenses, no DVD player with digital video out for my home theatre, no more technology. Period.
Wife and I are both feeling kicked in the guts over this. It seems everything when it comes to technology for us is jinxed or we get the run around from repairers and it ends up costing us.
A history of breakdowns can be found
here.
I have a good home theatre system. A history of the hassles can be found
here for people with too much time on their hands.
Sorry about breaking the rule about posting links to other forums but (a) it's not a camera forum, and (b) it's topical. And (c) it's about me.
As I said in my previous post, I am still hopeful of an amicable outcome. Meanwhile, I'm over-stressed at the thought of all this, and camera-less for nearly 3 weeks now.
Stay tuned to hear all about what Maxwell have said to me should the solution in this case be "less than amicable"...
At the moment I am pretty P!SSED with them but will give them a chance to respond.