Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by stubbsy on Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:02 pm
I'm buying an Epson R1800
From what I see the Ilford paper is the way to go so I'm about to buy some. There are two basic types - smooth and classic. The Smooth is nanoporous so dries faster but fades quicker while the Classic is resin coated so dries slower, but fades less. There's more on the differences here
So my question to those of you with experience with this printer & paper combo:
Which do you find better the smooth or the classic?
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Hlop on Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:13 pm
stubbsy wrote:I'm buying an Epson R1800 From what I see the Ilford paper is the way to go so I'm about to buy some. There are two basic types - smooth and classic. The Smooth is nanoporous so dries faster but fades quicker while the Classic is resin coated so dries slower, but fades less. There's more on the differences hereSo my question to those of you with experience with this printer & paper combo: Which do you find better the smooth or the classic?
As general rule, classic optimized for dye inks and incompartible to pigment. Smooth, while it's compartible with dye, optimized for pigment inks. My Canon i965 is dye-type, when Epson 1800, 2100, 2400 are pigment type printers
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by Hlop on Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:15 pm
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by gstark on Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:21 pm
That's all way too complex for me.
The pearl paper looks and feels great, and is basically the same look and feel as some of the more traditional papers, and that's why I use it.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Hlop on Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:25 pm
gstark wrote:That's all way too complex for me.  The pearl paper looks and feels great, and is basically the same look and feel as some of the more traditional papers, and that's why I use it.
They are "Classic Pearl" and "Smooth Pearl". As a proud owner of Epson R1800 you are supposed to use "Smooth Pearl"
Both of them are great - just made for different types of inks
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by stubbsy on Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:25 pm
gstark wrote:That's all way too complex for me.  The pearl paper looks and feels great, and is basically the same look and feel as some of the more traditional papers, and that's why I use it.
Gary - I'm a complex kinda guy! Thanks for the info.
Mikhail - thanks for the info too and the reference (which is excellent BTW). I'll order the Smooth Pearl then.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Glen on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:22 pm
Stubbsy, I use Smooth and love it. Wish I could say I made a technical reason to buy it like Mikhail, just really tried it after Gary's advice and stuck with it since. 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Glen on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:23 pm
PS congrats on the R1800, I am sure it will do your beautiful images proud
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by big pix on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:25 pm
I find epson stock equal to ilford on Epsons printers......... but then again a profiled computer and printer should always give good results.....
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by big pix on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:28 pm
....... also just having a profiled computer is not enough......... but the Epson canned profiles are very good if you are unable to profile your printer..........
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by big pix on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:34 pm
....... this Epson site is worth a look if you are doing your own prints......
http://tech.epson.com.au/downloads/prod ... rch+%3E%3E
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by Hlop on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:36 pm
big pix wrote:I find epson stock equal to ilford on Epsons printers......... but then again a profiled computer and printer should always give good results.....
Glossy? Maybe ...
Does Epson have Pearl paper? I don't think so ...
For everything 5x7" and bigger I'm using Ilford Classic Pearl only and it looks much better than very good Canon Photo Paper Pro
Mikhail Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
-

Hlop
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Singapore
-
by big pix on Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:53 pm
Hlop wrote:big pix wrote:I find epson stock equal to ilford on Epsons printers......... but then again a profiled computer and printer should always give good results.....
Glossy? Maybe ... Does Epson have Pearl paper? I don't think so ... For everything 5x7" and bigger I'm using Ilford Classic Pearl only and it looks much better than very good Canon Photo Paper Pro
YES they do but it is hard to get and it is called "SMOOTH FINE ART" also Epson "SEMIMATTE PHOTO PAPER [250] is also very good and easy to buy........
I print on both Epson and Ilford as I have made profiles for both stocks, for my computers, and have found no difference between the two different brands with quality of output using an Epson 2100.
The reason I use both, I have found that my local Harvey N store will have one or the other and rare to find both in the store at the same time ........
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by big pix on Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:00 pm
....... also the CANSON and ARCHES range of fine art stocks are very good .......... borge in Crows Nest stock these two or can get it in........ also Kayell stock some of the range........
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by stubbsy on Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:20 pm
Thank you all for the great info. Now all I've got to do is wait till next week for the printer
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Geoff on Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:22 pm
Peter, I too use the Classic Smooth Pearl Paper simply because it was recommended to me by the likes of our admins and mods Gary, Leigh and Glen! I couldn't go wrong! I love the results this baby gives me. You will love it!! Congrats!
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by gstark on Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:43 pm
And we should hopefully be able to try the continuous inking system on Birdddddog's 2100 at the minimeat this Saturday.
We'll bring some paper if somebody drags along some negs. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Geoff on Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:46 pm
gstark wrote:And we should hopefully be able to try the continuous inking system on Birdddddog's 2100 at the minimeat this Saturday.  We'll bring some paper if somebody drags along some negs. 
Drags along some what? Oh..some CF cards?
Wish we could be there but I'll be shooting a wedding!!
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Slider on Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:52 pm
I've been using Ilford Classic Pearl with the Canon Pixma iP8500 with very nice results. Does take a little while to dry properly but worth the wait. 
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by stubbsy on Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:05 pm
Interestingly Mark the Pixma i8500 is the printer I'm replacing with the Epson R1800
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Slider on Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:23 pm
stubbsy wrote:Interestingly Mark the Pixma i8500 is the printer I'm replacing with the Epson R1800
Not wanting to hijack the thread, why the change? I did look at the Epson but it was a lot more expensive. I got the Canon for $550 from David Jones of all places (had some DJs gift vouchers to use up)  The R1800 does A3 doesn't it?
-

Slider
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld
-
by big pix on Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:35 pm
.......yes.......
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by stubbsy on Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:35 pm
Mark. Fair question and not really a hijack
Like bernie said - I want it for the A3. Otherwise the Pixma i8500 is one awesome printer (although it must be said that the R1800 uses pigment inks whereas the Canon uses dye and apparently pigment is better).
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Glen on Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:37 pm
R1800 does A3+ (329x483mm)
so you get a + thrown in Stubbsy on top of your A3
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
Return to General Discussion
|