Random interjection
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:28 am
Sorry, had to share this...
I've just seen for the very first time "Dogville". Which is really inexcusable given that I'm a great fan of Lars von Trier's other work.
This film has got to be the crown of his achievements in the sense that he managed to strip the medium bare of everything other than great acting and great photography. The film has no set in the traditional sense, it pretty much plays out on a floor plan. What sets it apart from a stage play, though, is its masterful photography.
It is sometimes difficult for the unexperienced observer (like me) to recognise some of the great shots because they pass by too quickly. However, thanks to pause and rewind one can indulge in examplary composition and lighting.
I have a feeling that I'm going to watch this movie a fair number of times over. It won't likely displace my LvT favourite, Dancer in the Dark, though. If only for the fact that the latter features my darling sweetheart Björk...
Cheers
Steffen.
I've just seen for the very first time "Dogville". Which is really inexcusable given that I'm a great fan of Lars von Trier's other work.
This film has got to be the crown of his achievements in the sense that he managed to strip the medium bare of everything other than great acting and great photography. The film has no set in the traditional sense, it pretty much plays out on a floor plan. What sets it apart from a stage play, though, is its masterful photography.
It is sometimes difficult for the unexperienced observer (like me) to recognise some of the great shots because they pass by too quickly. However, thanks to pause and rewind one can indulge in examplary composition and lighting.
I have a feeling that I'm going to watch this movie a fair number of times over. It won't likely displace my LvT favourite, Dancer in the Dark, though. If only for the fact that the latter features my darling sweetheart Björk...
Cheers
Steffen.