Nikon 80-200ED 2.8 - great lens!

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Nikon 80-200ED 2.8 - great lens!

Postby Werewolf on Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:41 pm

Gave my new 80-200 it's first real test today as Wollongong beat Central Coast 3-2 in a thriller at WIN Stadium. Lens performed very well in rainy, poor light conditions, and I'm thrilled with the results.

Here's a few samples.

Image

Image

Image

Image

All with very little PP, but all resized for web of course.

I love this lens!

Steve
Wollongong Wolves, Manchester City, Newcastle Utd. D70 Freak!
User avatar
Werewolf
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby gstark on Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:47 pm

Steve,

Great stuff; tack sharp, great colour, and good use of DoF to separate the primary elements from the secondary, especially in #2.

I love the second and third images most.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Onyx on Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:12 am

Awesome shots!

Are you using a custom tone curve? The images seems a little dark to me... like using the normal tone curve without EV.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Werewolf on Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:45 am

Thanks for your comments. Much appreciated.

No custom curves - I wouldn't have any idea how to use 'em yet (still learning).

The images do appear darkish, but then again it was an evening game and overcast with light rain. They actually came out of the camera a lot darker and I lightened them in Capture.

Any suggestions on how to improve my results? I shot at 1600 with an ISO of 400. Ap 2.8 of course! I've found that if I increase the ISO beyond 800 in such conditions I get a fair bit of noise.

A vast improvement, however, on my Sigma 70-300 APO which was pretty much useless in poor light.
Wollongong Wolves, Manchester City, Newcastle Utd. D70 Freak!
User avatar
Werewolf
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby kipper on Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:50 am

Nice shots, you going to sell the Sigma? I'm thinking about it.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Werewolf on Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:02 am

Sorry kipper I want to keep the Sigma as it is very good in bright conditions. I like the extra reach too, and it's easy to lug around. Good travel lens for when I hit the road again!

I'm just about to buy a Kenko Pro 1.4 to increase the length on both the 80-200 and the Sigma.
Wollongong Wolves, Manchester City, Newcastle Utd. D70 Freak!
User avatar
Werewolf
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby kipper on Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:07 am

I have both the Sigma 70-300 APO (I not II) and the Nikon 70-300G, tossing up which one I should keep. I'm thinking about getting the Tamron x2 TC today.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK


Return to General Discussion