Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Heath Bennett on Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:50 am
Thanks Thanh. I think the D2h/s is ripe for the improving.
HB
-
Heath Bennett
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
- Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay
by birddog114 on Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:02 am
HB,
I'm waiting for the D3x in 2007 not the D3H/s
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-
birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Oneputt on Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:53 am
Very interesting, but even though it is Thom's educated guess, it is still a guess. Who knows?
-
Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by Steffen on Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:22 pm
Birddog114 wrote:HB, I'm waiting for the D3x in 2007 not the D3H/s
I'm more likely to wait for the D3x to come out and then get the D3H second-hand
Cheers
Steffen.
-
Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by Steffen on Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:39 am
Looks like Thom didn't see the Zeiss lenses coming...
Cheers
Steffen.
-
Steffen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: Toongabbie, NSW
by Heath Bennett on Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:08 am
Birddog114 wrote:HB, I'm waiting for the D3x in 2007 not the D3H/s
Unless they change the name of the series, to something like, well;
D2xs mark II
HB
-
Heath Bennett
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
- Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay
by Nnnnsic on Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:43 am
Grev wrote:And oh, he didn't predict KM's collapse...
Yes he did. Well, so much as he saw Sony essentially taking them. First: But 2006 is the year of new entrants. Sony (piggybacking off KonicaMinolta)
Followed by: Sony gets it wrong. I see four likely possibilities, all of which would be the wrong camera. (1) An R1 like entry but with a KonicaMinolta mount. (2) Something specified and priced lower than the KM D5. (3) A rebadged D5. (4) A completely new homebrewed consumer design, but with a KM mount. #1 is wrong because either it or the R1 loses. #3 is wrong because it essentially kills KM, which kills Sony's future in DSLRs (unless they buy KM's camera division). #4 is wrong because it's a first time DSLR design and it'll miss key features and/or performance. Thus, I'll go with #2, which will still prove to be wrong, because it'll hurt the R1 and KM and not be low enough priced to keep Nikon and Canon from lowering prices and defending territory. What Sony should do is aim at the 20D/D200 level, I think. I don't think you can sneak into the DSLR market from the bottom; you won't get the true prosumers, who really do care about systems they can grow with. So 12mp, 3-5 fps, well-appointed design (PC Sync, wired remotes, etc.), and a state-of-the-art autofocus system. Show that you're serious by putting out a 24-105mm lens for the mount that's as good or better than what's on the R1. Find a whistle you ring bells over (wireless flash, etc.). The R1 will hold the low end for now. KM will love it that you're not killing them quickly, and the true consumer Sony DSLR then comes in 2007.
-
Nnnnsic
- I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
-
- Posts: 7770
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
- Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW
-
Return to General Discussion
|