Page 1 of 1
Aus paparazzi
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:19 amby Glen
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:57 amby Onyx
Yet nobody's scrutinised the other end of the creature that's causing these recent 'friction' - the trashy mag editors and their customers with increasing demand for consumption of those shots that command the $50k prices mentioned that drives more individuals to become more desperate and take more bold steps.
Everybody enjoys steak, but nobody wants to kill the cow.
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:02 amby Glen
Chi, for $50k I would become a pest
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:20 amby gstark
I'm confused.
I've been told I am a pest, but I don't see any $50K ...
???
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:31 pmby sirhc55
gstark wrote:I'm confused.
I've been told I am a pest, but I don't see any $50K ...
???
A poor pest, maybe
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:36 pmby wendellt
there are two kinds of paparazzi, those who get invited to events to shoot the stars which they are expected to, and the other wannabees
Chi remember you met Tito Antonio at an event last year, now he is paid to take pictures of celebs and the celebs want their picture taken at these events
it's just the intrusive ones that give the real guys a bad name, i.e those who would take a picture of a star chowing down a burger, now what merit could that have?
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:43 amby Grev
Wow, $50k for a photo, where is mine!?!? I'd be a bastard for that money!!