New discussion about D200

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

New discussion about D200

Postby birddog114 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:45 am

Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Oneputt on Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:57 am

Interesting to have the Nikon story from inside :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Michael on Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:18 pm

You still selling D200's Birddog?
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby birddog114 on Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:34 pm

Michael wrote:You still selling D200's Birddog?


Yes, but no stock :(
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Michael on Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:06 pm

I'll be looking for one V shortly :)
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby johndec on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:28 pm

The interesting bit of the article is actually on page 1 (Birdy's link is to page 2) where they admit that the old D1 sensor was actually 10.8mp not 2.7mp. Due to technological limitations at the time they had to incorporate 4 pixels per photosite to acheive acceptable sensitivity and noise.

Assumably the D1x with 5.4mp (approximately) had 2 pixels per photosite which would also explain the curious 10mp mode one can acheive with the D1x in Nikon Capture??

Considering the D1 was announced in June 1999, this is really quite amazing. If DAC technology was on par with with sensor technology back then the D1 would have been an absolute technological marvel (even at its RRP of $US5,500).
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby birddog114 on Fri Feb 17, 2006 5:45 am

johndec wrote:The interesting bit of the article is actually on page 1 (Birdy's link is to page 2) where they admit that the old D1 sensor was actually 10.8mp not 2.7mp. Due to technological limitations at the time they had to incorporate 4 pixels per photosite to acheive acceptable sensitivity and noise.

Assumably the D1x with 5.4mp (approximately) had 2 pixels per photosite which would also explain the curious 10mp mode one can acheive with the D1x in Nikon Capture??

Considering the D1 was announced in June 1999, this is really quite amazing. If DAC technology was on par with with sensor technology back then the D1 would have been an absolute technological marvel (even at its RRP of $US5,500).


John,
Yes, it's.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby nito on Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:54 am

I found it interesting when they talked about skin tones and colour preference per area of geography.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby gstark on Fri Feb 17, 2006 7:59 am

nito wrote:I found it interesting when they talked about skin tones and colour preference per area of geography.


Yes, I found that to be interesting too.

Especially about the different colours of the sky.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby dooda on Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:26 am

I can almost always spot a picture posted in Vancouver when looking at photos of Flickr. I'm not sure if it's because I recgnize the area, or what, but I feel like I can even tell the difference between a sunset in Seattle and from one in Vancouver.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby Killakoala on Fri Feb 17, 2006 5:41 pm

Interestingly the ocean is the same. Different colours depending where you are. (Also smell, texture and saltiness can contribute)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Grev on Sat Feb 18, 2006 3:22 am

So how does a 10.8Mp image from the D1x compare to the 10Mp image from the D200?
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Postby nito on Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:14 am

Grev wrote:So how does a 10.8Mp image from the D1x compare to the 10Mp image from the D200?


Not as good because technology advances more and more. For the time a 10.8Mp D1x was a marvel.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW


Return to General Discussion