Page 1 of 1

should I be worried

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:55 pm
by nito
There is a latin american dance show on sat and my parents bought the tickets a few weeks in advanced. On the back of the ticket it said no photography. I contacted marketing and customer service manager at the club and she said to ask the promoter of the show. Phone the promoter and he said that I can take photo but the no photography rule was from the club.

Hmmmmm..... All this conversation was verbal, but will it hold on the night. I really want to try the 70-200 VR on this event. Prob come early to the event and hope they dont stop me taking shots. :roll:

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:57 pm
by birddog114
The rules are difference in between the promoter and the Club.
The promoter does not have the bouncer and the club has few of them and they're ready.
Your choice.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:37 pm
by nito
hmmm.... Then it depends if the bouncers are polite or will beat me up. :shock:

Re: should I be worried

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:47 pm
by moz
nito wrote:All this conversation was verbal, but will it hold on the night. I really want to try the 70-200 VR on this event.


If you can arrive early enough to be able to dump the camera if you get turned down, I'd do that. The other approach would be to email/fax and try to get something in writing. Don't be surprised if the latter turns out to be too much hassle for the people you're asking though. I've had good luck both ways, as well as "on the door list" which is the best way if you can wangle it. But for just taking personal photos, I'd just rock up.

(edit) and if you can get photo permission at all, it's worth trying with whatever lens you can get in, I reckon. I did quite well with The Herd and a 50/1.4 despite not being allowed on stage or in the wings, and they wouldn't let me use the 70-200 because it was "too big".

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:47 pm
by marcotrov
Good wishlist Nito but perhaps you should focus on getting a 17-35 f/2.8 because finding an 18-35 f/2.8 will take a long time even if you had the money :lol:
cheers
marco

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:18 pm
by nito
marcotrov wrote:Good wishlist Nito but perhaps you should focus on getting a 17-35 f/2.8 because finding an 18-35 f/2.8 will take a long time even if you had the money :lol:
cheers
marco


yeah I just noticed that, thanks. :D

Re: should I be worried

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:22 pm
by nito
moz wrote:If you can arrive early enough to be able to dump the camera if you get turned down, I'd do that.


That would be one good way to clear a crowd. Black parcel taped under the table. :D

PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:16 pm
by Geoff
My advice on this (and other events) is:

If you're unsure - don't.

It's sad but if they wanted to confiscate your beloved 70-200VR prior to entry , and the only choice was to not attend and go home (with cam and lens) or 'trust' the security doods - I know what I'd be doing.

Enjoy the latin American dancing without your cam.

It's sad that there are such grey areas when it comes to photographing 'events' and what is a 'professional camera' - my two cents worth.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:56 am
by birddog114
nito wrote:
marcotrov wrote:Good wishlist Nito but perhaps you should focus on getting a 17-35 f/2.8 because finding an 18-35 f/2.8 will take a long time even if you had the money :lol:
cheers
marco


yeah I just noticed that, thanks. :D


nito,
Come over and pickup my Nikkor 17-35 AF-S for the play.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:25 pm
by nito
Birddog114 wrote:nito,
Come over and pickup my Nikkor 17-35 AF-S for the play.


I will take up the offer at a mini-meet :D . I so want to try that lens out and buy it. We just bought a new car so that lens purchase is for later in the year.

Geoff, they have to take the camera and 70-200VR out of my dead hands at the event.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:46 pm
by MATT
nito wrote:hmmm.... Then it depends if the bouncers are polite or will beat me up. :shock:


I'd say dont forget the monopod 8) 8) :evil: ...

IF in doubt leave it at home.. I also think maybe the 50 1.8.. Or can you call the Club and ask them also??

MATT

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:57 pm
by kipper
I'd certainly persist, it might be a case they don't want a load of flash photography which can distract performers. I know at a ballet/dancing concert I use to help with at the end of each year there was a strict no flash photography rule as it distracted the girls while dancing (not that many people listened!).

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:06 pm
by birddog114
nito wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:nito,
Come over and pickup my Nikkor 17-35 AF-S for the play.


I will take up the offer at a mini-meet :D . I so want to try that lens out and buy it. We just bought a new car so that lens purchase is for later in the year.


nito,
You can pick it up tomorrow if you want to.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:16 pm
by spada
Hi Nito
Becareful, if you take that 17-35 , very soon you will be hooked to it :lol: , it is a fine lens.

regards
spada

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:20 pm
by nito
spada, I've heard good things about that puppy. It will be in the collection this year. :D

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:06 pm
by nito
I can report that I had no problems at the event.

There will be some photos posted later on, need to PP the shots. Overall the shooting conditions were not great.

Black backdrop with lots of different intensities of light confused the exposure system of the good old D70. Basically set the camera to underexpose to prevent unrecoverable highlights.

Motion of the dancing was very hard to capture and had to shoot at ISO800. It was a hit and miss affair, 1/3 of shots were deleted.

The lens performed really well. It was the perfect focal length because we were 10-15 m from the stage.

Only complaint was from a short guy behind me.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 4:20 pm
by spada
Hi
Good to hear that you can do some photo at the Club, Do you find that you use Longer lens more (70-200 ) or the wide angle (17-35 ) more, both are Nikon legendary lenses and which one are easier ( more keeper ) .

Thank
spada

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:07 pm
by Alpha_7
Glad to hear you could take the photos, and look forward to seeing the shots once you've had a chance to PP the images.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:51 pm
by nito
spada wrote:Hi
Good to hear that you can do some photo at the Club, Do you find that you use Longer lens more (70-200 ) or the wide angle (17-35 ) more, both are Nikon legendary lenses and which one are easier ( more keeper ) .

Thank
spada


Hi spada, tis was the 70-200 I took.