Policeman and woman was removed from duty at CG.

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Policeman and woman was removed from duty at CG.

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:17 am

Interesting reading also:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=92069

Don't understand why one of the senior policewowman was removed from duty after taking photo of the Queen? :shock:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Re: Policeman and woman was removed from duty at CG.

Postby Hlop on Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:29 am

Birddog114 wrote:Don't understand why one of the senior policewowman was removed from duty after taking photo of the Queen? :shock:


Article says she was taking up-close photos. I think, it was some breach of protocol and she probably get herself really unacceptable up close. Just thoughts
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Re: Policeman and woman was removed from duty at CG.

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:36 am

Hlop wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:Don't understand why one of the senior policewowman was removed from duty after taking photo of the Queen? :shock:


Article says she was taking up-close photos. I think, it was some breach of protocol and she probably get herself really unacceptable up close. Just thoughts


Is it something fishy by taking up-close photos of the Queen in public places?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Mal on Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:42 am

If my memory is correct, a mate (a copper) told me that when you are on duty you are not supposed to be taking photo's, talking on the phone or doing any other activity other than what you are there to do. In this case keep an eye on Liz.
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:10 am

It’s like going to a strip club - look but don’t touch or photograph :lol: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby moz on Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:13 am

Mal wrote:In this case keep an eye on Liz.


For fear she might escape?

I thought they were supposed to keep an eye on everyone except Liz, in case someone want to be rude.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:14 am

sirhc55 wrote:It’s like going to a strip club - look but don’t touch or photograph :lol: :lol:


I doubt many have made that connection before.
I'm sure the monarcists would be up in arms. :lol:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:15 am

Perhaps and hope it's just the protocol for all officers on duty and nothing in relation of taking up-close photos of the Queen in public places.

But our diggers and GIs taking their photos while they're on duty, especially at a prison in Iraq :shock:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby kipper on Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:23 pm

They have a job to do and it doesn't include taking photos of the Queen, unless they're part of the Crime Investigation Unit (or whatever they're called) and she's lying on the ground dead.

For instance if I was at work and I decided to take photos of landscapes because I get really good views from the top of high rise building. I would expect to be repremanded as my employer isn't paying me to do that.

Their job is to be keeping the area secure and observing and detecting any suspicious behaviour. If you're taking photos (especially if they're closeup portraits) you won't be doing that job. On the other hand if you were taking photos of evidence that somebody was up to no good that'd be different :)
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby kipper on Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:24 pm

The GIs, the Police, and all the other clowns out there taking photos and getting into the paper for all the wrong reasons are why everyone is so against photography in public places.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Re: Policeman and woman was removed from duty at CG.

Postby Glen on Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:26 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
Don't understand why one of the senior policewowman was removed from duty after taking photo of the Queen? :shock:


Acne or bad skin?
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Policeman and woman was removed from duty at CG.

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:58 pm

Glen wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
Don't understand why one of the senior policewowman was removed from duty after taking photo of the Queen? :shock:


Acne or bad skin?


Perhaps protecting her secrets: how and what treatment did she use?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:59 pm

kipper wrote:The GIs, the Police, and all the other clowns out there taking photos and getting into the paper for all the wrong reasons are why everyone is so against photography in public places.


Those photos from Iraq was screened by SBS, was not taken in public place.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:20 pm

moz
Very droll. :D :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby xerubus on Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:47 pm

not sure about other states, but in queensland the police and members of the emergency services are not to use any photographic device whilst on duty, unless their role is associated with photographics. this includes film/digital cameras of any sort, as well as video and mobile phone cameras.

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby birddog114 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:49 pm

xerubus wrote:not sure about other states, but in queensland the police and members of the emergency services are not to use any photographic device whilst on duty, unless their role is associated with photographics. this includes film/digital cameras of any sort, as well as video and mobile phone cameras.

cheers


Hey you're wrong!!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

The Highway Patrol COP uses Digital Speed Camera! :lol: it's a camera isn't it? :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby xerubus on Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:52 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol:

perhaps i should have said unless it is part of their particular role :)

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby Killakoala on Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:53 pm

Rules were meant to be broken. :)

Did the copper in question get to keep her pics though???

The trick is not to get photographed taking photos of someone/something you're not supposed to be photographing. :shock:
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:02 pm

The pictures were destroyed, so no keeping them :(
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby whiz on Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:34 pm

From the senior victorian police that I'm currently working with at VICPOL HQ in Flinders St, the images were taken with a camera phone, right in the Queen's face.
Very inappropriate.

She was basically removed for demonstrating gross stupidity. That's all. No legalities were crossed.
People put way too much rubbish in signature blocks.


Image
whiz
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:28 pm
Location: Richardson, Canberra


Return to General Discussion