And now i'm not so sure about it...
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:33 pm
I mean sure, it's a damn sexy piece of glass and it thoroughly dispelled my idea that VR was nothing more than a marketing gimmick, that lens makes clear images at 1/4 @ 400 (600) for me, something impossible with no VR in my hands..
I'm talking about the 80-400VR again, as a lot of people are at the moment. I'd blame birddog but he's a good guy.. just Wednesday he saved my bacon.. I realized on Tuesday morning that there was no way I would be lugging my laptop around on Wednesday on my trip to the zoo, so I PM's birddog asking if there was any chance at all that I could get a card rushed down.. I was leaving at 11:30 the next day.
Never have done business with me before he still got the card to me at 11:29am on the following day, literally as I was walking out the door.. so we won't blame birddog.. k?
I've been planning on buying the lens, thinking about how great it'll be.. but then I look at my shots from the zoo on Wednesday..
http://pixspot.com/thumbnails.php?album=122
Wednesday was a really crap day for walking around the zoo, my back was aching and it was cloudy, raining, or threatening to rain. Then the sun finally came out and I took some photos.
Looking at the photos though I don't see how the lens would have assisted me. I've been slowly tackling this technical learning curve but haven't really been focusing on the artistic. I now shoot fully manual, never any of the pre-programmed modes. So I feel technical proficient now, I know what to do in most circumstances, I know what the camera can do and what the lens can do.. and what it cant..
The lens is a 70-300 Tamron.. maybe a little soft at 300 but here's the thing, at no point during the day did I wish that the lens was longer, at no point during the day did my shaky hands come into play.. the only limitation I had was due to the available light and that if I slowed the shutter speed down the movement of the subject became an issue..
Anyway, something for me to think about. In the mean timeā¦
http://pixspot.com/displayimage.php?alb ... 0065&pos=1
Awwww
I'm talking about the 80-400VR again, as a lot of people are at the moment. I'd blame birddog but he's a good guy.. just Wednesday he saved my bacon.. I realized on Tuesday morning that there was no way I would be lugging my laptop around on Wednesday on my trip to the zoo, so I PM's birddog asking if there was any chance at all that I could get a card rushed down.. I was leaving at 11:30 the next day.
Never have done business with me before he still got the card to me at 11:29am on the following day, literally as I was walking out the door.. so we won't blame birddog.. k?
I've been planning on buying the lens, thinking about how great it'll be.. but then I look at my shots from the zoo on Wednesday..
http://pixspot.com/thumbnails.php?album=122
Wednesday was a really crap day for walking around the zoo, my back was aching and it was cloudy, raining, or threatening to rain. Then the sun finally came out and I took some photos.
Looking at the photos though I don't see how the lens would have assisted me. I've been slowly tackling this technical learning curve but haven't really been focusing on the artistic. I now shoot fully manual, never any of the pre-programmed modes. So I feel technical proficient now, I know what to do in most circumstances, I know what the camera can do and what the lens can do.. and what it cant..
The lens is a 70-300 Tamron.. maybe a little soft at 300 but here's the thing, at no point during the day did I wish that the lens was longer, at no point during the day did my shaky hands come into play.. the only limitation I had was due to the available light and that if I slowed the shutter speed down the movement of the subject became an issue..
Anyway, something for me to think about. In the mean timeā¦
http://pixspot.com/displayimage.php?alb ... 0065&pos=1
Awwww