O/T: Watch this before it gets "yanked"

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

O/T: Watch this before it gets "yanked"

Postby DVEous on Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:37 pm

... Obsolete ...
Last edited by DVEous on Sat May 03, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DVEous
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:32 pm

Postby moggy on Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:52 pm

Fascinating! :o

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby johndec on Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:52 pm

Yeah,I saw that the other day via a link on another forum. An interesting excercise in selective editing. Of course they convieniently forget to tell us if flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon, then WTF happened to it? Did it land in the Bermuda triangle and disappear?

The blast damage in the inner rings is consistent with the inverse relationship of the disapation of energy (just like an SB-800) :lol:
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby owen on Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:58 pm

johndec wrote:(just like an SB-800) :lol:


Way to bring it back on topic :)

:lol:
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Michael on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:20 am

It's certainly an interesting video, they made it well.
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:23 am

Nice editing.

I've heard this issue before and I have no idea where I stand on it, either.

Still, interesting.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby DJXtreme on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:38 am

it's well put together, but it looks like they went to the michael moore school of selective editing.

i'm not really convinced either way, but as john pointed out, this raised a lot more questions that it answered.
Cheers,

Will
DJXtreme
Member
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:51 am

I have, since seeing the WTC crashes, and the Pentagon crash been 100% certain that the whole operation was a high level American plot.

Only 2,749 death certificates were issued and although any death is unfortunate the question arises as to why there was only 5k to 7k people in each tower. As the first jet hit at 8:46:26am (by the atomic clock) why was there over 40,000 people not at work?

I could go on about this for hours, but will desist.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Michael on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:53 am

sirhc55 wrote:I have, since seeing the WTC crashes, and the Pentagon crash been 100% certain that the whole operation was a high level American plot.

Only 2,749 death certificates were issued and although any death is unfortunate the question arises as to why there was only 5k to 7k people in each tower. As the first jet hit at 8:46:26am (by the atomic clock) why was there over 40,000 people not at work?

I could go on about this for hours, but will desist.


Alot of them evacuated before the collapses?
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby xorl on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:24 am

Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby DVEous on Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:05 am

... Obsolete ...
Last edited by DVEous on Sat May 03, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DVEous
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 1:32 pm

Postby TonyH on Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:21 am

I can't believe that anyone can really doubt the fact that the aircraft hit the pentagon.

The logistics involved to "fake" it under the noses of the employees in the building in addition to timing it with the twin towers attack is just plain impossible.....

Conspiracy theorists always present reasonable arguments, but when really scrutinised rarely hold up.

Just my thoughts....
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby stubbsy on Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:14 am

And man didn't land on the moon, and UFOs are real, and Harold Holt defected to the KGB, and the CIA organised the Whitlam dismissal, and....

Bottom line is there are lots of things in the world we'll never know are true or false. Better to not waste our time on them
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby huynhie on Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:17 am

stubbsy wrote:And man didn't land on the moon, and UFOs are real, and Harold Holt defected to the KGB, and the CIA organised the Whitlam dismissal, and....

Bottom line is there are lots of things in the world we'll never know are true or false. Better to not waste our time on them


I don't really care about any of those, as long ans Sata Clause is real I am happy. :lol:
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:32 am

Michael wrote:
sirhc55 wrote:I have, since seeing the WTC crashes, and the Pentagon crash been 100% certain that the whole operation was a high level American plot.

Only 2,749 death certificates were issued and although any death is unfortunate the question arises as to why there was only 5k to 7k people in each tower. As the first jet hit at 8:46:26am (by the atomic clock) why was there over 40,000 people not at work?

I could go on about this for hours, but will desist.


Alot of them evacuated before the collapses?


The figures for the amount of people in the two buildings was as I stated above - maximum people in both buildings 14,000 - these are official figures :!:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:34 am

TonyH wrote:I can't believe that anyone can really doubt the fact that the aircraft hit the pentagon.

The logistics involved to "fake" it under the noses of the employees in the building in addition to timing it with the twin towers attack is just plain impossible.....

Conspiracy theorists always present reasonable arguments, but when really scrutinised rarely hold up.

Just my thoughts....


The easiest thing to fake is when it is under military control - I know this from my own experiences with US spooks between ’67 and ’69 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby tasadam on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:41 am

huynhie wrote:I don't really care about any of those, as long ans Sata Clause is real I am happy. :lol:
Santa Claus is real, and has a nickname with the initials T.H. :wink:
Share what you know, learn what you don't.
Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au
User avatar
tasadam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania

Postby smac on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:50 am

Am I missing something here, if a 757 didn't hit the pentagon, then what actually happened to flight 777 and all of the people aboard.....perhaps they were abducted by aliens?

Stuart
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby byrt_001 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:06 pm

hi

very interesting, but there is a lot of conspiracy theories about it, also about the bomb/s on the towers.

thanks

christian
check my website>> http://www.6701.sunpixs.com
User avatar
byrt_001
Member
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: beatifuloutback,carnarvon. wa

Postby admajic on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:20 pm

The Towers and the Pentagon, the whole thing is interesting. I dont know why they didnt crash into the building 20 minutes later when there would have been 10000 more ppl there or where they told not to come in that day? An Israeli friend of mine said he knew that the tower was going to get attacked that day.
RE: pentagon I have seen pics that show aircraft parts on the ground at the pentagon. The ppl were arguing that the parts werent from a large aircraft. Who knows....
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby admajic on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:22 pm

Forgot to mention. Im sure the US used this to build up for there assult on Iraq. We all know they only really went in there to get a dtrong hold on the Oil and probably steal it.
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby TonyH on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:33 pm

sirhc55 wrote:
TonyH wrote:I can't believe that anyone can really doubt the fact that the aircraft hit the pentagon.

The logistics involved to "fake" it under the noses of the employees in the building in addition to timing it with the twin towers attack is just plain impossible.....

Conspiracy theorists always present reasonable arguments, but when really scrutinised rarely hold up.

Just my thoughts....


The easiest thing to fake is when it is under military control - I know this from my own experiences with US spooks between ’67 and ’69 8)


I understand what you are saying, but I reckon it's just too big in terms of scale and timing.....
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby TonyH on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:34 pm

tasadam wrote:
huynhie wrote:I don't really care about any of those, as long ans Sata Clause is real I am happy. :lol:
Santa Claus is real, and has a nickname with the initials T.H. :wink:


If that's directed at me..... Ho, Ho, Ho,....... :D
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:36 pm

TonyH wrote:
tasadam wrote:
huynhie wrote:I don't really care about any of those, as long ans Sata Clause is real I am happy. :lol:
Santa Claus is real, and has a nickname with the initials T.H. :wink:


If that's directed at me..... Ho, Ho, Ho,....... :D


I'd imagine he was actually meaning Thanh aka Birddog giver of gifts.

But I could be wrong.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby TonyH on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:39 pm

On reflection you're probably right
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby whiz on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 pm

I think that the " Watch this before it gets yanked" is a bit lame now. This site has been up since 2002 when I first saw it.
I think that if it was going to get yanked, the powers that be might have figured out how to do it by now.

Back when I first saw it, I sent it to a friend who had also received links to it many times already.
I call him an authority because he was one of the many people who physically SAW THE PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON. He was walking towards it at the time and would have been attending a course there in the next half an hour. Right next to him was another Navy guy who I also consider to be an authority on that issue.
They both have the best available Defence Security Clearances and neither are in the habit of telling fibs about such things.

Both of them can't understand why this bullshit is being perpetuated as almost 100 eyewitnesses saw the hit.
Many more were in buildings that the plane flew past.

So lets kill this conspiracy theory.

As for the US invading Iraq, why didn't they "help out" other countries without oil?

As has been said.

The only reason that the WTC collapses didn't kill a LOT more people is that most people in the WTC start work at 9am.

Sorry, but the answer is that simple. They weren't there yet.
Last edited by whiz on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
People put way too much rubbish in signature blocks.


Image
whiz
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:28 pm
Location: Richardson, Canberra

Postby birddog114 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 pm

TonyH wrote:On reflection you're probably right


TonyH,
You could be a Santa Claus at this Xmas dinner for Brisbane Chapter in November.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby TonyH on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:46 pm

birddog114 wrote:
TonyH wrote:On reflection you're probably right


TonyH,
You could be a Santa Claus at this Xmas dinner for Brisbane Chapter in November.


Could do it Birdie, if you can get a suit large enough to fit...... Santa looks like he's anorexic compared to me..... :D
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70


Return to General Discussion