Camera Backpacks

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Camera Backpacks

Postby squeeze on Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:58 pm

I'm not sure if there is already a thread made. I'm looking into buying a camera backpack which could fit my laptop, d70, 17-35mm and an extra lens (possibly to fit a 70-200mm when needed). i have heard lots of good things from Lowepro and Crumpler. however i have a budget of $200-300. would love to hear your thoughts.

Cheers
Anthony
squeeze
Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Epping - NSW

Postby birddog114 on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:01 pm

Lowepro Computrekker+ is within your budget and can be used for extra stuff and well handle all the gears in the near future.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby daniel_r on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:02 pm

I'm working on a post for the equipment review section about my newly acquired Crumpler Karachi Outpost - I'll see if I can get it finished off and posted up this weekend.

So far it is an impressive backpack, if a little on the more expensive side.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby squeeze on Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:06 pm

thanks for your imput guys.. birddog - i might have a look at the Lowepro Computrekker.. looks like its the good :D
squeeze
Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Epping - NSW

Postby micka on Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:32 pm

I also have a Crumpler Karachi Outpost... holds everything I need it to, D70s, 18-70, 50 f1.8, 80-200 f2.8, sb-600, extra batteries, chargers, cf cards, cables, manuals, 14" G4 iBook. There's also plenty of room to fit another lens or two (upon typing this I am trying not to look at the credit cards).

It only opens from the rear, which means you need to take it off and lay it down to get access to your stuff. While this takes a few extra seconds, it also means that noone can possibly take things from your bag while you're wearing it in busy places. It also means you won't get your back dirty if you put you bag down on the ground to get things out of it.

For me it's a bit big if you're going to use it as your only bag... it's a bit of a pain to carry around in some places . I also have a crumpler 6 million dollar home when I don't want to carry all of my things.
micka
Newbie
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:09 am
Location: Hampstead, South Australia

Postby Bob G on Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:55 pm

agree with Birdy. Lowpro Computrekker is great and has a pullover waterproof cover. Will give you room to expand

Bob G
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
User avatar
Bob G
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.

Postby DanielA on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:31 pm

I'd also recommend the Lowpro Computrekker. It holds a lot of stuff.
Image

Daniel
Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
User avatar
DanielA
Senior Member
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby Yi-P on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:42 pm

I dont have the compu trekker, but the mini-trekker.

It hold most of my 'outting' gears in one go and its quite good to have a carry of heavy bag on me for the whole day.

I had tried to fit a D70, 70-200/2.8 (not mine), 300/4, 50/1.8, 18-70, SB800 under one go, but obviously this is not my outfit for all days, its to heavy with just the first 2 lenses.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby LostDingo on Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:09 pm

you'll need at least that size to handle the 70-200 Anthony
User avatar
LostDingo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Rozelle

Postby squeeze on Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:17 pm

LostDingo wrote:you'll need at least that size to handle the 70-200 Anthony

paul. the 70-200 is on my wishilist hence i would like to get a bag which in future would be able to accomodate that :)
squeeze
Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Epping - NSW

Postby moz on Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:49 pm

Don't forget the Desley packs. I have one and like it a lot, and the prices at G&V are pretty reasonable as a rule. I paid $200 for one that holds a 12-24, 24-70, 70-200, 85/1.8, flash, body and has a laptop compartment as well. It's also exactly on the size limit for carry-on luggage with airlines, which helps if you're flying at peak time. IMO one advantage of Desley is that they're not so commonly associated with cameras, so you might be less likely to get picked out. I'm really happy with my bag.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.


Return to General Discussion