Filter to protect 70-200VR

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Filter to protect 70-200VR

Postby greencardigan on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:18 am

I'm looking for a filter to protect the front element of my 70-200VR.

Firstly, will a good quality UV or skylight filter degrade the image quality at all?

Secondly, UV or Skylight?

Thirdly, Hoya or B+W?

I read this thread which suggests that the Hoya's aren't as good as the B+W's.

Can some 70-200 owners tell me what they use?

Cheers,
GC
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby stubbsy on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:30 am

I have a Hoya HMC UV filter on my 70-200 VR. Never had a problem.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Paul on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:39 am

I would agree with what Peter has just said.
Buy it, screw it on, forget about it! :D
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby blacknstormy on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:45 am

I've got the same filter on my 80-200 AFS - don't even know that it's there :)
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby greencardigan on Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:52 am

User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Paul on Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:12 pm

I have the HMC Super (O) brand.
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Re: Filter to protect 70-200VR

Postby digitor on Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:49 pm

greencardigan wrote:I'm looking for a filter to protect the front element of my 70-200VR.

Firstly, will a good quality UV or skylight filter degrade the image quality at all?


I guess that's debatable - stuff like this http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00GGtp pops up regularly on forums around the place. It may be specific to certain lens/filter combinations.

Reflections between the front element and the filter are another problem which can be encountered, best to remove a filter when shooing into strong light sources. Sometimes it's not easy to see the flare spots in a D70 viewfinder, as there is quite a few flare artefacts present in the viefinder under these conditions which don't appear on the picture. (Maybe due to the AF beamsplitter)

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby gooseberry on Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:14 pm

I'd recommend the Nikon L37c or Nikon NC filter, or if not those then the B+W MRC. The Hoya SHMC is OK. I've seen on another forum showing various tests of filters for flaring/ghosting, the Nikons were the best, followed by the B+W and then the quality degraded from there based on price of filter.

A simple test you can do with filters is the place the filter on top of a white piece of paper. You will see that the Nikon filters are absolutely clear with no colour cast or image quality loss whereas with the cheaper filters (Hoya etc) you can see a definite colour cast.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby greencardigan on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:10 pm

gooseberry wrote:I'd recommend the Nikon L37c or Nikon NC filter.

HKSupplies has the Nikon NC filters on ebay for about $75 AUD delivered. Might be the way to go.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Raskill on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:26 pm

Gee, you have a 70-200 VR, I had one once, got rid of it...... Cheap nikon garbage!!!! :wink:
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby greencardigan on Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:32 pm

Raskill wrote:Gee, you have a 70-200 VR, I had one once, got rid of it...... Cheap nikon garbage!!!! :wink:

Yeah, I got it from some guy on this forum. :D
And it looks well looked after for "cheap Nikon garbage" :wink:
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby rookie2 on Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:21 pm

after acquiring my VR I took Fozzies advice (below) and bought the B + W for $115. Very happy so far.

1. I use B+W MRC (010M) UV-HAZE Filters and purchased in Australia from:

http://www.mainlinephoto.com.au/category19_1.htm

Filters are made by this company, and worthwhile looking at:

http://www.schneideroptics.com/filters/ ... otography/

Unfortunately they do not come cheap. Hoya do have problems with flaking coating.

I work on the theory, buy once.


cheers

rookie2
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby wendellt on Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:37 pm

uv filters don't affect image quality sometimes when they get dirty they can cause artistic flare in some lighting conditions

see all those tack sharp images in the newspaper, photo journalists lens are full of crap and most of the time they dont clean them and they still produce clear and shrap images

i use the nikon L37C

and the hoya super HMC (0)
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby greencardigan on Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:04 pm

Thanks for the help everyone.

There's a Nikon NC filter in the mail heading my way.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby petermmc on Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:08 pm

Most of the filters cited are just really good protectors. I think I have sacrificed at least 3 filters by dropping camera and having filter take the full brunt of the crash. That's why I like filters with a wider depth on the sides.

Peter Mc
Nikon & Olympus
User avatar
petermmc
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Figtree, Wollongong

Postby Steffen on Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:27 pm

petermmc wrote:I think I have sacrificed at least 3 filters by dropping camera and having filter take the full brunt of the crash.


Wouldn't a lens hood be much more effective in a situation like that?

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW


Return to General Discussion