Page 1 of 1
I want to look like ...
Posted:
Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:36 pm
by gstark
A pro ?
No ... that's not the reason: I have lots of camera bodies here, but all of mine are fully functional and operational.
But, I do have a project - that will be documented for a future version of Chimp - that needs a dead SLR camera body, so if anyone has one that they're no longer in need of, please feel free to respond to this thread or to send me a PM
Posted:
Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:14 pm
by sheepie
I might have a minolta you could have, but it's currently in Melbourne. When do you need it for?
Posted:
Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:24 pm
by phillipb
Gary, does it have to be intact, I have a couple that are well and truly dismantled.
Posted:
Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:53 pm
by Nikkofan
Gary
I have a Nikon FG, which you are welcome to. I've been told it's only good as a paperweight, but haven't actually brought myself to that yet. We had many wonderful years together and I am still mourning the loss (although my grief was somewhat assuaged by my new F100).
Posted:
Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:40 pm
by gstark
Leon,
no great hurry ...
Phillip,
How dismantled? That may still be useful ..
Lyn,
Thanx, yes, that would be perfect, and I suspect you know what I'm going to be doing with this ...
Posted:
Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:35 pm
by Nikkofan
Yes, I guess you could say I've "seen the light" ....
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:09 am
by phillipb
gstark wrote:
Phillip,
How dismantled? That may still be useful ..
This dismantled...
First one is a Minolta XG1 Second is a Pentax MX
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:45 am
by Steffen
Gary,
I've got a Nikon EM with motor drive, that is fully functional and in good cosmetic condition. However, the light-seal foam has liquidified and gooed up the edges of the mirror. Getting it cleaned would cost more than the camera is worth. You can have it if you want.
Cheers
Steffen.
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:29 am
by gstark
Phillip,
They are seriosuly dismantled.
Dare one ask why?
Mind you, the Pentax still has its mirror box intact.
Steffen,
Yes please, that would be great.
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:38 am
by phillipb
Gary,
Sometime ago when I got interested in collecting old cameras I decided to have a go at fixing non operational cameras bought cheaply from Ebay.
A dismall failure.
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:20 pm
by shakey
phillipb wrote:This dismantled...
The first one looks like its never going to be "remantled"
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:33 pm
by Glen
PhillipB, you have more guts than me
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:00 pm
by phillipb
I did manage to keep some intact, some of them I even managed to get them to work
The Minolta has provided a few springs, baseplate ect. for other cameras and will definitely never get put back together.
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:11 pm
by Glen
Philip, pretty impressive collection
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:16 pm
by phillipb
Thanks Glen, they look impressive in the cabinet, but the dearest one there is the Butcher Klimax made in 1910 (top shelf leftmost) and that was US$50.00
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:25 pm
by Nnnnsic
You look like you've got a few TLR's there.
Any of them work?
Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:32 pm
by phillipb
Not reliably, the two voightlanders are ok but they're very basic. The Rolleicord has shutter problems and the altiflex seems to work but not sure of accuracy of shutter speeds
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:10 am
by ozczecho
phillipb wrote:gstark wrote:
Phillip,
How dismantled? That may still be useful ..
This dismantled...
First one is a Minolta XG1 Second is a Pentax MX
This one looks like Mark Latham had a go at dismantling it...
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:10 am
by ABG
Hmmm, now what would you be wanting a non-functioning camera body for Gary?
Could you please let me know when you're thinking about commencing your little project. I have a few non functioning flashes and a dead Minolta body handy.
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:22 am
by gstark
Non-functioning flashes? What's the issue with those?
I've got an old Sunpack here that works, but I'm almost thinking in terms of buying a couple of disposable cameras - with flashes - for this project. I can't think of a better/cheaper source of a working flash unit.
I'm thinking of this as a weekend project in a week or two ...
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:33 am
by ABG
gstark wrote:Non-functioning flashes? What's the issue with those?
Batteries leaked after I left them in there too long
Might be useful for other purposes though.
I've also got a few old cheapies lying around that I bought when I was a kid just getting into photography.
gstark wrote:I'm thinking of this as a weekend project in a week or two .
Cool. Keep me posted please
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:08 am
by Antsl
Hi Gary,
If you get a chance have a look for a dead or dying Nikon F-501 ... it is great for what you have in mind as there are some large cavities that you can play with in putting it together. Another advantage with this camera is that it already has a battery pack in the base so all you have to do is take wires from the pack to your electronics!
Disposable flash units will work in this project however remember that they only require one
AA battery to make them happen and the sync voltage is very high (not good if you are going to connect your new device to a digital device).
Hope this is a help!
Ants
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:15 am
by gstark
Ants,
Very useful information, and especially the reminder about the synch voltage.
Your comments regarding the battery compartment in the 501 are noted as well. The EM is a significantly smally body, but a single
AA will work there.
It'll certainly be an interesting exercise.
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 11:25 am
by Rick
Phillip,
Did you serve your apprentiship with Mark Latham?
Cheers
Rick
Posted:
Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:00 pm
by phillipb
I taught him well didn't I.