Posted:
Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:02 pm
by adam
Interesting!
and a good way to get many flickrstream views - although perhaps unintended.
We don't have to give $5 right?
Posted:
Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:27 pm
by Yi-P
Very interesting on how people react to photographers nowadays....
Posted:
Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:15 am
by Matt. K
Five bucks! The cheap bum! If he had any class he would have asked for $50!
Re: SMH Article : "A cheap shot at street photography&q
Posted:
Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:11 am
by rmp
I don't agree with this because the logic is flawed. Simply, while in Australia one does not have copyright over one's image, photographers need to exercise common decency when taking images of people. I can't see why the affulence of any given person would change that, and it's far too subjective a call anyway.
Interesting
Posted:
Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:34 pm
by zafra52
Thank you that is a very interesting article BT*ist dealing with issues I had to content with during my last trip to China last year. Many of the tourists in my group were what I consider quite aggressive and did not respect privacy of their subjects. I did, but my photos were fewer and not as good.
I guess my problems were and still are should I ask permission, if I do would the subject play to the camera, should I take candid photos and deal with the issue later? Is not demanding a payment for a candid photo another form of begging? Are we not allowed to photograph public places? And if people happen to be in them can they not always move, or at least cover their face? I am never sure. But, I am always sure of one thing and that is that I don’t photograph children without first asking their parent permission and later I make a point of showing the pictures. I guess you can say I am too scared of the consequences.