Page 1 of 1
Just to think.....
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:05 pm
by MHD
It was not that long ago that you couldnt burn your own CD.... now it is commonplace and almost outdated
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:08 pm
by Nnnnsic
Almost?!?!?!
But seriously... this is the way technology goes.
Hell, it wasn't that long ago that people flew in small amounts... in fact, we still do... but today,
Airbus is launching their A380... which can take over 500 people on two decks... it's a Super Jumbo Jet!
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:10 pm
by Mj
Yep... won't be long before we're talking terabytes rather than gigabytes... by then cd capacity will be laughable.
Remember the days of the 5" 1/4 floppy holding 360K? Or even 8" floppies???
Michael.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:14 pm
by MHD
Double sided? Double Density?
Remember that holepuncher thingy you used to make a 5 1/2 disk double sided?
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:14 pm
by JordanP
Mj wrote:Yep... won't be long before we're talking terabytes rather than gigabytes... by then cd capacity will be laughable.
Remember the days of the 5" 1/4 floppy holding 360K? Or even 8" floppies???
Michael.
I remember audio cassetts and Microbee's
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:16 pm
by MHD
I remember Microbees too... Frogger and Pirates...
I had a TRS-80 at one stage...
Start loading a program and go make a cuppa...
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:20 pm
by robw25
i remember when i used to wear a bright yellow shirt with purple embroided flairs with yellow ribbon down the sides and a huge belt buckle,,,,, what was that all about !! if i wore that now i would be told to get back in the closet !!!!!!!!!!!!
lets not try to remember eh !
cheers rob
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:27 pm
by gstark
robw25 wrote:lets not try to remember eh !
That's too easy for me to do.
Without trying, even.
Flashback
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:30 pm
by the foto fanatic
My first job, in an insurance company office, was calculating premiums for all the new applications. Back in 19xx.
No pocket or even electronic calculators in those days - we had a manually operated
mechanical calculator - no electric power, you moved a cylinder using a hand crank for adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. It was a Swedish machine called a
Facit.
It was absolute luxury when they finally became electrically powered!
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:42 pm
by ajo43
In a previous life I worked at Qantas and worked on the purchase of these babies.
A friend sent me these pics of the A380s first outing.
700 people on a double decker plane - that's progress.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:53 pm
by Killakoala
WARNING::: Standby for an understatement.....
Wow, that's big....
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:05 pm
by Greg B
Wow Jonesy, sensational. Thanks for the shots. Interesting that they have gone with two engines.
Imagine the queue coming through customs!
Re: Flashback
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:09 pm
by Greg B
cricketfan wrote:My first job, in an insurance company office, was calculating premiums for all the new applications. Back in 19xx.
No pocket or even electronic calculators in those days - we had a manually operated
mechanical calculator - no electric power, you moved a cylinder using a hand crank for adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. It was a Swedish machine called a
Facit.
It was absolute luxury when they finally became electrically powered!
Hey cricket, we had one of those at the bank branch I worked at in 1972 - we did a lot of currency conversions.
I think it was 73 or 74 when an electronic calculator arrived, it was magic. The manager at the time made an observation that was interesting - how do you know it is correct!
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:09 pm
by Matt. K
Only 2 engines???? Must be Volvo engines.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:12 pm
by Greg B
Matt. K wrote:Only 2 engines???? Must be Volvo engines.
So presumably the pilot will be wearing a hat.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:12 pm
by Matt. K
On a more serious note...if the plane loses 1 engine the pilot is going to do a "go around" with 700 passengers aboard, on 1 engine???? I don't think so. Only Birddog could do that.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:14 pm
by birddog114
Thanks Matt!
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:15 pm
by owen
Greg B wrote:Matt. K wrote:Only 2 engines???? Must be Volvo engines.
So presumably the pilot will be wearing a hat.
... and it will be a very slow trip.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:15 pm
by Greg B
That's what I was thinking Matt, at least a 747 can lose one and still have 75% power, with some on each side. That is one big bird to fly on one donk. Especially up hill.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:17 pm
by digitor
Greg B wrote:Wow Jonesy, sensational. Thanks for the shots. Interesting that they have gone with two engines.
Imagine the queue coming through customs!
Looks like it will get four, but this aircraft has only the inboard one fitted on the port side and the outboard one fitted on the starboard side.
Cheers
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:23 pm
by ajo43
Don't worry these beasts have 4 engines! They only have 2 fitted to this one at the moment.
The engines are absolutely massive. The same circumfrence as a 737 body. If you are a seagull and you are hanging out anywhere near the runway then you better make a run for it.
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:46 pm
by Matt. K
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:55 pm
by birddog114
and they use the remote control to fly the beast, ask BBJ, he got the remote to fly this ones
Posted:
Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:11 pm
by BBJ
HAHAHA I dont think my big Jumbo servo's are big enough to fly that beauty, nice lady pitty about her colour though. relying on 2 engines well, lets say if 1 goes offline i dont think i would like to be sitting in it and i might need more controls on my 6 channel JR computer radio's. I dont think i would want to try a deadstick landing with it.LOL
Re: Just to think.....
Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:04 am
by atencati
MHD wrote:It was not that long ago that you couldnt burn your own CD.... now it is commonplace and almost outdated
Wow, I remember way back in the dark ages when peple actually used a cellulose called "film?"
to take pictures...how archaic is that!!!!!
A
Re: Flashback
Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:55 am
by the foto fanatic
Greg B wrote:I think it was 73 or 74 when an electronic calculator arrived, it was magic. The manager at the time made an observation that was interesting - how do you know it is correct!
Yup, that was about the time frame.
Did you ever get the Facit to divide 1 by 0? We had one nutter who used to do that before he went home every evening - the poor calculator (I use that word loosely!) would chug away all night trying to reach an answer.
For the calculations I used to do, we had another person independently doing the same calculations, and still a third person whose job it was to match the two independent calcs and decide they were right. Only then would we let the customer know. Talk about redundant systems.
Insurance offices are much smaller now.
Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:27 am
by Greg B
digitor wrote:Greg B wrote:Wow Jonesy, sensational. Thanks for the shots. Interesting that they have gone with two engines.
Imagine the queue coming through customs!
Looks like it will get four, but this aircraft has only the inboard one fitted on the port side and the outboard one fitted on the starboard side.
Cheers
Yes digitor and Jonesy, on further examination of picture #2, I see it all. I'm happy about that, four is better with 700+ people on board.
Interesting fact about the circumferance of the engines Jonesy. Everything is so goddam BIG. Although I dare say things will still be "cosy" in cattle class where I travel.
Re: Flashback
Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:33 am
by Greg B
cricketfan wrote:Greg B wrote:I think it was 73 or 74 when an electronic calculator arrived, it was magic. The manager at the time made an observation that was interesting - how do you know it is correct!
Yup, that was about the time frame.
Did you ever get the Facit to divide 1 by 0? We had one nutter who used to do that before he went home every evening - the poor calculator (I use that word loosely!) would chug away all night trying to reach an answer.
For the calculations I used to do, we had another person independently doing the same calculations, and still a third person whose job it was to match the two independent calcs and decide they were right. Only then would we let the customer know. Talk about redundant systems.
Insurance offices are much smaller now.
Yeah, I hear all of that cricket, I think we would do a division on the machine, then someone would do the long multiplication to check it.
The other thing is that we used to manually calculate the interest (in the Bank). Once a year on the savings accounts, working through the interest products (based on the minimum balance each month) and monthly on current accounts (based on the daily debit balance). Much overtime with drinking and eating of dim sims was involved. And a bit of hanky panky as I recall.
And all the tellers had their own pistol in those days too. It is a miracle how few incidents there were looking back on it.
Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:51 am
by gstark
Fully fly-by-wire.
And it runs Windows as the OS!
Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:55 pm
by leek
back to the original subject... (sort of)
I completed my computing degree before PCs were invented... used punched cards & paper tape when programming, my first
modem was an acoustic coupler, my first IBM PC had a 10Mb hard disk (which we struggled to fill), I owned one of the world's first pocket calculators (the Sinclair Cambridge), played
Chuckie Egg on a Sinclair Spectrum with a microdrive (which was actually a tape)... supported an entire (book) library system that ran in 256kb of memory on a minicomputer and have worked with computers that filled rooms the size of tennis courts...
I'm sure that I'll think of more... but all of the above is pretty amazing when I have 1Gb of memory in my D70
[/list]
Posted:
Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:42 am
by Onyx
gstark wrote:Fully fly-by-wire.
And it runs Windows as the OS!
Step aside Y2K, we got bigger problems...
Posted:
Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:00 pm
by digitor
Onyx wrote:gstark wrote:Fully fly-by-wire.
And it runs Windows as the OS!
Step aside Y2K, we got bigger problems...
Ha, you're not wrong there! One of the measures of success for a recent fighter development project which shall remain nameless (mostly because I can't remember it) was the number of in-flight reboots, and great success was hailed when the number dropped from an average of 15 to 4. The scary thing is, I'm not joking.
Cheers
Posted:
Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:02 am
by gstark
digitor wrote:Onyx wrote:gstark wrote:Fully fly-by-wire.
And it runs Windows as the OS!
Step aside Y2K, we got bigger problems...
Ha, you're not wrong there! One of the measures of success for a recent fighter development project which shall remain nameless (mostly because I can't remember it) was the number of in-flight reboots, and great success was hailed when the number dropped from an average of 15 to 4. The scary thing is, I'm not joking.
I've been offloaded from Airbuses - twice - when they were unable to reboot the systems on the plane. Fortunately, we were still on the ground.
Posted:
Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:30 am
by MattC
gstark wrote:Fully fly-by-wire.
And it runs Windows as the OS!
God I hope not! It would give new meaning to Blue Screen Of Death!!!!
Cheers
Matt
Posted:
Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:36 am
by gstark
The sky-blue screen of death.
Still, it's nothing like the red screen of death.