ND8 + Polariser

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

ND8 + Polariser

Postby jben_net on Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:37 pm

Hey all,

So my current goal is to shoot a fountain during the day and have an exposure that goes long enough for the water to give that lovely soft blur.

I just recieved an ND8 and was surpised to find that it was only 1-2 stops darker than my circular polariser.

Do you think combining the ND8 and the polariser would cause me to loose clarity in my picture?

I don't have time to test it because I'm at work. If there's anyone who's done this please let me know.

Also what is the darkest ND grad? Its so hard to find them at the moment I rang around all afternoon yesterday and the only place that had them was a place called vanbar in sydney.

Cheers,

James
User avatar
jben_net
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:26 am
Location: Newcastle

Postby Justin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:42 pm

I remember wendellt said he had a 64000ND (maybe not grad though)

Not sure where to buy these though
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Yi-P on Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:52 pm

Is the ND8 you bought of a grad or plain ND?

Combining CPL and ND is possilbe to cut down effects, but may result in uneven exposure from the CPL and possible vignetting from your lens. They are not very thin filters to start with.

You might want to consider stacking another plain ND on top for extra stops.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Gordon on Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:26 pm

If you want to make a *really* dense filter, used crossed polarisers. That will be a very large number of stops, depending on the quality of the polarisers.
Photographic quality polarisers do degrade image quality, but it is not noticeable for most subjects.
About 15 years ago I took some images of the night sky using a good Hoya polariser on hypersensitised TP2415 film and every star had a short thin line running through it- artifacts caused by the polariser.

Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
User avatar
Gordon
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory

Postby phillipb on Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:31 pm

Gordon wrote:If you want to make a *really* dense filter, used crossed polarisers. That will be a very large number of stops, depending on the quality of the polarisers.
Gordon


...and if that doesn't work use a welder's helmet :wink: :lol:
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Gordon on Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:18 am

phillipb wrote:...and if that doesn't work use a welder's helmet :wink: :lol:


hehe you could... they are dense enough, but unfortunately not of optical quality!

You can use mylar solar filter material though, its fairly inexpensive and dense enough for photos of the sun... but will probably give you a strange blue cast

Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
User avatar
Gordon
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory

Postby Greg B on Thu Sep 28, 2006 3:10 pm

My R72 (?) IR filter allows approximately a billion stops less light through :shock: Ai carumba.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne


Return to General Discussion