Sigma 28 - 70Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sigma 28 - 70Hello,
I have a question, someone maybe able to answer for me. I am looking at purchasing a Sigma 28-70 / 2.8 EX He tells me it is 2.8 all the way through. The man in the shop, has told me it is a brilliant lens, But I am not sure wether he is just trying to sell me something. Thank-you in advance
don't have any experience with that lens but i've been looking into a mid tele sigma lens lately as well and found this pretty good site for reviews
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
I havent tried this lens, but I did a short test with the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX
The lens itself is amazingly big, not as the Nikon 28-70 but still very big and heavy glass. Feels solid and optic is quite good except some occasions at wide open apertures. Short tests results showed up sharpness from f/4 down to f/5.6, superb at f/6.3 - f/8 and then slows back down again. Its not a HSM lens, but focus is good and quick in acceptable lighting conditions. I've heard that the 24-70 performs better than the 28-70 version. But I cant prove this yet havent used the 28-70.
Specs for the 28-70mm F2.8 EX DG
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses ... avigator=2 Specs for the 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses ... avigator=2 Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
only issue i have with the 24-70 (which others may not) is the 82mm filter size
Bigfoot, I'd be tempted to go for the 24-70 as it'll give you an extra 4mm, which after conversion is 6mm. Sometimes that 6mm can make a difference esp when your back is against the wall Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
I've got a 24-70mm F/2.8.
It's a great big peice of glass, and in my opinion, produces sharp images at all focal lengths: This was taken at 24mm- This was taken pretty close to 70mm- I think it's a top lens. I recommend it anyway. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Thanks for your replies.
Great Pics, If I can take pictures like that with that lens I would be very happy! I was offered the 28-70 for $400 Brand new, I assume this is a good price, When I priced the 24-70 it was nearly double the price... I do have a 18 -55 for the closer shots, What do you think ! Is the 28-70 worth buying?
I got my 24-70 from DD photographics in North Sydney for $599. I think you may be able to get it even cheaper than that if you shop around. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
sold mine recently.
http://dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?p=24 ... ht=#242061 here is a sample image from that lens, tack sharp. I never had a problem with it, only sold it b/c I bought the Nikkor 28-70 f2.8, like comparing apples to busses Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|