macro v microModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
macro v micromacro photography versus micro photography.
whats the difference? is it in the magnification level...? Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Nathan
I think you'll find the difference is in the marketing. AFAIK they are one and the same. eg the Nikon "macro" lenses are actually called Micro Nikkors Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Macro photography is a true 1:1 sizing, i.e., if a 6mm fly is photographed and it appears on the film or sensor as 6mm. Microphotography would bring you into the realm of larger than life.
It has nothing to do with marketing in the true sense. Any lens from Nikon that does not go greater than true life is not a micro lens but should in fact be called a macro lens. Therefore - Tamron and Sigma follow the true definition Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
thanks very much guys!
much appreciated Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|