Page 1 of 1

macro v micro

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:02 pm
by NJ
macro photography versus micro photography.
whats the difference? is it in the magnification level...?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:20 pm
by stubbsy
Nathan

I think you'll find the difference is in the marketing. AFAIK they are one and the same. eg the Nikon "macro" lenses are actually called Micro Nikkors :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:32 pm
by phillipb
I always thought that originally micro photography referred to photos taken using a microscope and marketing took over a bit later.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:48 pm
by sirhc55
Macro photography is a true 1:1 sizing, i.e., if a 6mm fly is photographed and it appears on the film or sensor as 6mm. Microphotography would bring you into the realm of larger than life.

It has nothing to do with marketing in the true sense. Any lens from Nikon that does not go greater than true life is not a micro lens but should in fact be called a macro lens.

Therefore - Tamron and Sigma follow the true definition

:wink:

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:51 pm
by NJ
thanks very much guys!
much appreciated :)