Page 1 of 2
		
			
				All forum members should have a crack at this.
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:54 pmby Matt. K
				
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:34 pmby beetleboy
				I find this clause interesting:
22 - In consideration of Moran accepting the entry into the MCPP, the entrant consents, and Moran reserves the right, to
reproduce all entries received in all publications and publicity for the MCPP, inclusive of all electronic/digital or print
media. Moran is not liable to pay the entrant any fee, royalty or other form of remuneration for this right.
They can use your image(s) even if you don't win.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:51 pmby mark
				Thanks Matt, I will.
Beetleboy - I guess for some this would seem a bit rude and imposing on behalf of the organisers, but I'm sure there are just as many others that would be delighted at the opportunity to have their photo used irrespective of winning a prize.
Edit: I just noticed this 
There are no entry fees for the Secondary or Primary Schools Sections. Each student, or group of students, may submit up to three entries.
 I am going to let Sam, (my 8 year old son) have a go too.
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:30 pmby beetleboy
				I understand your point of view Mark but at the end of the day these companies often build large photo libraries from these competitions. If they have $60,000 to give away as prize money, what's stopping them from hiring a pro and keeping us photog's employed?!
The 
AIPP and ACMP both agree that these kinds of clauses are detrimental to the photography industry.
I'm all for this company running a competition, choosing some finalists and awarding them..why must they have the right to use ALL entries as they see fit?
Sorry to take this thread  

 but this is a hot topic!
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:54 pmby Ronza
				Been collating my entries and trying to cut them back to 10 images as per the limit. Luckily for me I'll qualify for the "Secondary" competition muhaha; no entry fee.
For $17k they can have any of my shots, at a shot at $17k and the glory, granting them licensing doesn't sound that bad.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:58 pmby beetleboy
				As long as you win Ronnie..otherwise they have the right to keep your image(s) on file and use is it/them completely free (forever).
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:48 pmby Yi-P
				This must be a very tough challenge!!
So many photographers around and 10 per each for the Open season, that is thousands of great photographs to be rated. 

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:57 pmby Reschsmooth
				There was an article in Capture mag a while ago (if I recall) that talked about the problems of comps which allow the organisers permanent and free use of entrants' photos. The basic argument was that these comps are basically a means of stocking libraries. 
(Bear in mind I have no experience with any photo competitions whatsoever). 
P
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:18 pmby Manta
				I must admit, I'm now in the camp that has a problem with this sort of comp, due to what's already been mentioned here. Sure, someone wins but, in the final washup, it's photographers that are the ultimate losers, IMHO. It's like flooding the market with a cheap product that others are trying to sell for a reasonable price. To me, it devalues the legitimate work of professional shooters. Cheap stock photo sites do the same thing. Just my thoughts.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:20 pmby Alex
				Manta wrote:I must admit, I'm now in the camp that has a problem with this sort of comp, due to what's already been mentioned here. Sure, someone wins but, in the final washup, it's photographers that are the ultimate losers, IMHO. It's like flooding the market with a cheap product that others are trying to sell for a reasonable price. To me, it devalues the legitimate work of professional shooters. Cheap stock photo sites do the same thing. Just my thoughts.
 LOL, Manta, just like dumping in customs 

. Couldn't agree more, though...
Alex
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:04 amby DaveB
				beetleboy wrote:I find this clause interesting:
22 - In consideration of Moran accepting the entry into the MCPP, the entrant consents, and Moran reserves the right, to reproduce all entries received in all publications and publicity for the MCPP, inclusive of all electronic/digital or print media. Moran is not liable to pay the entrant any fee, royalty or other form of remuneration for this right.
They can use your image(s) even if you don't win.
Of course, this may be intended as the limited proposition to use the images in promoting future competitions (not for any and all uses).  Clause 10 specifies that more clearly for prize-winning entries, but the wording in clause 22 isn't as clear as I would like.
It's not necessarily as evil as you might be assuming...  Maybe it's evil intent, maybe it's just stupidity...
If you don't like it, contact them and query them as to the intent of clause 22 (why have it when they already have clause 10?).
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:14 amby Heath Bennett
				I wont be entering. I hate even the slight whiff of a rat.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:20 amby mark
				beetleboy wrote:I understand your point of view Mark but at the end of the day these companies often build large photo libraries from these competitions. If they have $60,000 to give away as prize money, what's stopping them from hiring a pro and keeping us photog's employed?!
The 
AIPP and ACMP both agree that these kinds of clauses are detrimental to the photography industry.
I'm all for this company running a competition, choosing some finalists and awarding them..why must they have the right to use ALL entries as they see fit?
Sorry to take this thread  

 but this is a hot topic!
 
Liam - You have misinterpreted this clause. This clause relates to the use of images to promote the 
MCPP (Moran Contemporary Photographic Prize) only and as such should be considered fair play. You might like to read the terms & conditions of entry for 
The Archibald Prize which are not dissimilar in nature. 
There is no way you could interpret this to mean they will use the images to create a stock library, as they exclude this by stating
 to reproduce all entries received in all publications and publicity for the MCPP, inclusive of all electronic/digital or print media
 I'm more inclined to believe the reason for this prize is more related to the following quotes from their web pages. 
Moran wrote:Doug Moran was inspired by the Australian public’s love of portraiture to create the Doug Moran National Portrait Prize. He also wanted to create a vehicle to support established and developing artists.
And 
Run in conjunction with the Doug Moran National Portrait Prize, the MCPP is a national photographic competition created to promote contemporary photography and excellence in all forms of still photo-based artwork, including all types of analogue and digital photography. 
$80,000 expenditure to create a stock library for a Health Care group with less than a dozen photos on their own web site, all of which look to have been taken by a professional photographer that they most likely paid for. I simply don't believe it and neither should you.  

Now back to the original topic, I couldn't agree more with Matt's Subject line.
Matt. K wrote:All forum members should have a crack at this.
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:44 pmby beetleboy
				You are correct Mark. I did misinterpret the clause as I wrongly assumed MCPP to be the coporate body and not the competition. Thank you for pointing that out.
So by what you're saying; they will only use images entered to promote the competition? I can't say I have a big issue with that since it's unlikely to be more than a handful of pic's.
I'm reconsidering. I might enter now!
And in future I'll attempt to make a better effort of interpreting the rules  

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:57 pmby Manta
				Got me too Mark. I'll admit my cursory scan missed some salient points. Thanks for pointing out the differences.
 
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:53 pmby Willy wombat
				beetleboy wrote:As long as you win Ronnie..otherwise they have the right to keep your image(s) on file and use is it/them completely free (forever).
I refuse to enter the competitions that conduct business like this. Its a rort.
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:29 pmby beetleboy
				So did anyone else enter this comp?
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:45 amby the foto fanatic
				I hope many did. 
BTW, and not wanting to influence anyone one way or another, but do you know anything about Doug Moran and the Moran Group?
Doug Moran is one of those characters, like Lang Hancock and Kerry Packer, where it's hard to know where truth ends and fiction starts.
Just Google him and read. It's an eye-opener.  

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:14 pmby beetleboy
				Had a quick read after your suggestion cricketfan - very interesting; seems there was an Australian Story about him in 2003..
http://www.abc.net.au/austory/content/2003/s932900.htm 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:22 pmby Ronza
				beetleboy wrote:So did anyone else enter this comp?
Yep - I submitted my 10 Photos into the Secondary Category. Actually spoke to the organiser Danielle Nolan (IT issues). 
Two interesting points cropped up in conversation
a) The Moran portrait prize has been running for ages; the photography prize however is in its inaugural year. Might explain the lack of photography on the site and the lack of "past winner".
b) In relation to the copyright concerns - the point mark picked up on was confirmed by Danielle. If the image becomes a finalist it will be used only to promote the MCPP and the competition. 
The finalist are announced later next week (around the 8th) so hopefully my $17 000 cheque will be on its way by the 15th  

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:37 amby beetleboy
				You lucky bugger Ronnie! I wanted to enter 8 images but the open section costs $25 per entry so I only entered 1!!
I also spoke to Danielle cos my credit card transaction failed and the site had no means of me attempting it again!
Hoping my $40,000 cheque will be in the mail soon  

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:53 pmby Ronza
				Received a call today from Danielle; 3 of my shots were selected as finalists for the secondary division  

 Absolutely stoked with that, scrambling now to get the stuff printed and delivered in time to the Moran group.
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:17 pmby Ronza
				Err, the photos that they ended up choosing.
 
The Usual Suspects; Sydney, NSW. October 2006
 
Palm Beach, NSW. December 2006
 
Anonymous Consumerism; Melbourne, VIC. December 2006
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:42 pmby Matt. K
				Ronza
Good luck mate! I think you are in with a chance.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:57 pmby Willy wombat
				Good luck mate - that is great for you that you have been selected as a finalist!
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:58 pmby beetleboy
				Holy crap! 3!
Good work Ronnie!
Haven't heard anything RE the open division as yet.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:39 pmby Alpha_7
				Excellent Stuff Ronnie, I had a feeling you'd do well, but 3 IS OUTSTANDING!!!!  
Got my fingers and toes crossed for you... hmmm any thoughts on what you'd spend the prize money on if you won ?
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:42 pmby Ronza
				:O; just an update - the first image at Town Hall Station has been shortlisted to the Top 5 by the judges. Received a call from the Moran Group yesterday and they'll be flying me into Sydney next week for the gallery opening and press conference on the 13th!
1/5 shot at the big money, pretty stoked 
 
Hopefully if I spend the (Adelaide) long weekend there, I'll try and meetup with some of the Sydney dSLRUsers folk 

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:57 pmby macka
				Congrats, Ronza, this is a great achievement!  

 Enjoy your trip.
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:10 pmby rooboy
				Well done Ronza 
 
I can't see the other finalists on the website, do you know which other 4 were selected?
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:41 pmby Alpha_7
				Congratulations Ronza, whether you win or lose at this point Top 5, is massive and very well deserved. Congratulations!
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:14 pmby Matt. K
				
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:46 pmby Ronza
				So I've just come downstairs from the State Library - the press conference just took place to announce the winners. While the official results are "media embargo'ed" until 6PM, tune into the 7.30 Report or the ABC News this evening and you might see me 

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:51 pmby owen
				All the best Ronza.  Exciting! 

  I'll try tuning in.
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:55 pmby Alpha_7
				I'll make sure the Toppy is set to tape. 

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:01 pmby Ronza
				Im at the opening now - ducked out of the gallery from boredom and tension (no one knows the results and we can't say anything).
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:08 pmby Yi-P
				All the best Ronnie 

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:11 pmby Sherlock
				Good luck Ronza! I'm sure nick will be stoked on an EOS  

 (personal joke 

 )
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:20 pmby radar
				Amazing result Ronza,
congrats on winning, just caught you on the ABC News, bloody fantastic,
André
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:21 pmby Alpha_7
				34k, Nice work Ronza well done, I really liked that shot the first time you posted it, nice little earner for you, well done!
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:35 pmby michael_
				damn congrats ronza, 34k you must be over the mooon, what you upgrading to? 

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:40 pmby radar
				It's actually only $17k to Ronza and $17k to his school. 
 
Didn't Canon announce a new camera recently  
 
  
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:43 pmby drifter
				Wow .Congrats Ronza.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:43 pmby ozczecho
				Mate well done....a great image..well deserved and as the old saying goes.."you gotta be in it to win it..." Again well done...
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:44 pmby marcotrov
				Congrats Ronza. Well deserved and to have reached top 5 that's terrific. Good luck! 
 
 
cheers
marco
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:51 pmby Matt. K
				
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:33 pmby Dr Jan Itor
				Well done Ronza!
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:28 pmby DanielA
				Ronza wrote:[...] tune into the 7.30 Report or the ABC News this evening and you might see me 

 
I hadn't been following this thread, so I was surprised to see you on the ABC news.  Well done.  Fantastic result.  Well deserved.
Daniel
 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:29 pmby Yi-P
				The 1D MkIII comes knocking on your doorstep right now eh??  

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:55 pmby colin_12
				Great news Ronza. Congratulations.
Regards Colin