Page 1 of 1
More speculation on the D3...announcement Monday 5th?
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:55 am
by anubis
OK guys, its a boring night...If your interested:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=22300426
My little bit: Thom Hogan did say the D3 had something which he thought was really special.... FF with a DX crop?
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:22 am
by MHD
mm 50/1.2 AF-S lens....
[/quote]
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:00 am
by Killakoala
Who knows? I guess we all will on Tuesday if there is an announcement. Anyway, if Nikon does announce a new camera, we won't see it until next year.
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:19 am
by sirhc55
Who cares - you should all be happy with what you have in your hands now (camera wise). If I have said it once, I have said it a thousand times - owning the latest and greatest does not make you a great photographer
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:57 am
by NeoN
sirhc55 wrote:Who cares - you should all be happy with what you have in your hands now (camera wise). If I have said it once, I have said it a thousand times - owning the latest and greatest does not make you a great photographer
NeoN
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:18 am
by PiroStitch
Will believe it when I see it and it's too late for me
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:39 am
by ATJ
What is the benefit of full frame over what we have now? Is it simply the size of the sensor, such that a larger sensor will be more accurate regardless of the number of pixels?
While it is fun to look at what else there might be, I'm happy with what I can do with the D70 and don't think a "better" camera would make me a better photography as Chris states. Probably the only improvement I would like would be a larger viewfinder as the one on the D70 is difficult to use underwater - but I still get by.
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:55 am
by Heath Bennett
Medium Format Digital is something you can see the difference with.
DX vs FF is a pixel peepers paradise unless you are talking Hi ISO.
Regardless, changing from Nikon to Canon to MFD is not going to improve how you frame and light a pic.
Posted:
Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:02 pm
by Nnnnsic
For most of us, Full-Frame will mean nothing, and for some it will be more of a pain in that it means we have to be concerned about the quality of our glass more and then how good the aperture is when we're firing off a shot.
That said, I'm not a fan of the Full-Frame Canon's because of things like focus-point design and the way the camera handles.
If Nikon do make the switch on one camera, I imagine that it would have to be with an in-house sensor.