Why only Canon lenses used for sport photography these days?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Why only Canon lenses used for sport photography these days?

Postby redbluegreen on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:38 pm

Why is it when there is a sports event on box, there only seems :? !! to be Canon lenses being used. Has Nikon given up the chase or are Canon simply a better telephoto in the 300 to 800mm market.

I do not really have a preference but just simply like to know why as there used to be Nikon back in the older film days and not many Canons?
redbluegreen
Newbie
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: OXLEY ISLAND

Postby Kyle on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:50 pm

Canon Tele lenses were the 1st to start featuring IS, i believe.. :) Which gave them the head start on the sports shooting front...

At least thats what i've read... :)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Canon

Postby redbluegreen on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:00 pm

Can you please tell me what IS is?
redbluegreen
Newbie
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: OXLEY ISLAND

Postby bwhinnen on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:06 pm

IS = Image Stabilisation similar to the VR in Nikon Lenses.

Canon have a wider range of telephoto primes with IS, where as the largest in the Nikon range is the 300 f2.8 VR.

Nikon has the better zoom though with the 200-400 f4 VR.

But the prevalence of Canon has something to do with a better AF system back in the Film days that had a few people jump ship, with a significant investment in lenses (remembering a 600mm prime is in excess of $15000) most people have stayed with them.
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane


Return to General Discussion