Any chance of a Perth "locale"Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Any chance of a Perth "locale"Hey guys and gals...
Just curious why perth been left off your "locales" list? Iam sure there are a few of us sandgropers kicking round... Respect to those who click!
Please raise your voice!
Gary, we have had a call, please add in on the list. Thanks Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Re: Any chance of a Perth "locale"
Because, until now, there's been nobody from Perth here? At this point, and from looking at the membership list, you're it. However, that's not a reason to not add Perth to the locales, so consider it done. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
The "Perth Locale" is a hive of activity... With just me in there...
Just posted this... Please feel free to drop into the Perth thread and offer your ideas/thoughts and opinion...I have broad sholders... One of the first pics i took from my D70 One from out the front of my house: One which is in RAW format, so unfortunately my PC is'nt handling "RAW" to well... I went on a late night photog excursion throughout the Perth CBD after work (3am), not much came outy of it as I am new to the DSLR experience. But i learnt alot! However I am having trouble webhosting my RAW images if anyone can help it would be greatly aprieciated Respect to those who click!
Nice images.
Don't expect to find a way of webhosting raw images; that's really not what it's about. Instead, you should consider your raw images as if they're your negatives, and also treat them as your intellectual property. Use NV, PP, NC or PS to process the raw images (as if you had a darkroom) with .jpgs as your target for output, and then post smaller, somewhat low-res versions of the jpg to the web. The reason I suggest low res images is simply for bandwidth limitations; not everybody has access to a high speed connection (thanx Telstra for keeping us in the 1880's) and a 5MP raw file, downloaded over a 56 dial-up connection isn't going to be a pretty sight. Oh yes, browsers don't recognise the raw format either, so most people won't be able to view images posted as raw anyway. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Ha Click
Just fire away in Raw then convert them to JPG & resize for the internet. That would be the easiest way to go, gives you more space on your Mem card when you just shoot in Raw not Raw + JPG. Cheers Ray >> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
I shoot in raw + basic myself; but as ray says, you can always create the jpg later.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|