DSLRUsers.com

Don't you hate it when your working a wedding, the bride is about to walk in, and you screw off your lens hood and the front end of the lens (85mm f1.4) comes off with it. Then the front element comes out with the remaining internals about to follow.

Anyway, i put the whole lot back together and it turned out ok. The only problem is, i have one spring left over. lol. Guess i'll be taking a trip back to Nikon during the week.

Shit... for a tank like lens.. I'm very surprised, especially since this is such a highly regarded lens and very much at the top of the Nikon collection.. to just fall apart... yikes..

Man how hard did you screw off the lens hood?

Holy hell padey, that's a heck of a dilemma!

Glad to hear it will probably be okay though Great lens, surprised to hear of one falling apart though, I used a couple of them on the weekend and they felt pretty damn solid to me

I was just thinking while using mine the other day, I love this lens.

Question: Would it be better to mount the hood direct to the lens, and then the filter, or filter then hood? Initially I put the filter, then the hood, but I'm thinking the hood is now effectively 6mm longer over the front element. If the length is insignificant, what would be best from a protection point of view? (I hate the day I drop this lens)

Sorry to hear about your dilema, hope you didnt miss out on a key shot.

I was of the same mind with you guys, this lens is a huge chunk of glass built like a tank. But the spring washer that i'm holding in my hand has changed my mind.

The day did turn out fine.

http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/pade/1.jpg

http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/pade/2.jpg

http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/pade/3.jpg

Rebuilt 85mm
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/pade/4.jpg

http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/pade/5.jpg

We need pictures

Reminds me of my Merc - paid $100,000 for it and the battery failed on the first day - it does not matter what you buy there is always the chance of failure - or just falling apart

padey
were you ever featured on an ABC television program?
because i swear that i saw the end of a show and it mentioned cato and pade

bumthology wrote:padey
were you ever featured on an ABC television program?
because i swear that i saw the end of a show and it mentioned cato and pade

Not that we know of, but we have had about 4 independent people tell us the same thing.

Maybe I should start watching the ABC. lol

Ouch, that is bad

I should take some care over the lens hood mount/unmount with this lens...

Andrew,

It was probably some coooking show, and they were talking about potatoes and pate.

gstark wrote:Andrew,

It was probably some coooking show, and they were talking about potatoes and pate.

I was thinking bananas in pajamas.

Oz_Beachside wrote:my posted question seems to have not made it through earlier today (update errors I guess).

Wondering, if on a lens like the 85/1.4 where the hood is a screw on type, should the filter be behind, or infront (inside) of the hood?

Currently I have my filter directly on the lens, but I'm thinking the hood would be deisgned to go directly on the lens, and add a filter on after.

Any thoughts on this logic?

Sorry, I don't use any filters on that lens.

Six of one...

The hood is way too short to cause vignetting on DX sensors. I use CPLs a fair bit, so it is easy to guess where I put the filter.

Cheers