DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
After Persistant Rumours Nikon Clarrifies Full Frame PositioModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
After Persistant Rumours Nikon Clarrifies Full Frame Positio
Last edited by anubis on Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
Why the sad face?
If "full" frame really mattered so much to a Nikon user, wouldn't they have switched to Canon by now anyway? Photo gallery online <a href="http://photoden.net/oliver">here</a> and some more on deviantArt <a href="http://oliau.deviantart.com">here</a>.
Sad face because as usual they didn't say anything !
Don't get me wrong for the photography that I do a Full Frame camera wouldn't really help much anyway. Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
Er, what am I missing?
That tells me nothing new, and simply restates what senior Nikon people have been saying for the last four years or so. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Agreed, just more of the same rhetoric, nothing!!!!!
I would love to sneak a peak at their R&D section to see what they really are working on. But who wouldn't?  Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
