Page 1 of 1

Lesson learned...

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:25 pm
by ozimax
I received my Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS from Poon a few weeks ago. Beautifully packaged and presented, built like a tank etc etc. I had a lot of fun for a few weeks, then I started to notice that the images were not as sharp as I would have expected.

I mainly shoot wide open, so I stopped down a bit and alas, no discernable difference in image sharpness. I called in to see a very well respected pro in Brisbane last week, he took a series of test shots for me with and without IS and came to the same conclusion - only 20% of shots were tack sharp. This is a legendary lens and should produce A1 results most of the time.

I was wondering what to do and then I thought of something - I had an el cheapo protective filter on the front. I removed it and voila!! - photos are tack sharp to the expected standard.

So the moral of the story is, either buy a top quality filter for your expensive lens, or use none at all, which is what I am going to do, at least for the present time. I know this is not news to many on this forum, but it is true anyway - don't buy cheap lens filters.

Ozi.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:37 pm
by methd
The 'pro' should really have noted that straight away :)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:52 pm
by ozimax
He did, but he took some shots anyway. Actually, my friend said that it may be a focussing problem, not a lens problem, but it seems to be fine without a filter on it.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:54 pm
by Matt. K
ozimax
Perhaps it was an oil filter? :D

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:02 pm
by Killakoala
Laughs at Matt.

Filters suck anyway, unless they add to the image. The lens-shade that comes with the lens will protect it well enough.

Congrats on the purchase too ;)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:49 pm
by Reschsmooth
I don't think you would be the first to buy a $1000+ or x lens and put a $10 filter on it! :lol:

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:16 pm
by ozimax
Reschsmooth wrote:I don't think you would be the first to buy a $1000+ or x lens and put a $10 filter on it! :lol:


$2000+ lens and a $5 filter... :oops:

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:16 pm
by ozimax
Matt. K wrote:ozimax
Perhaps it was an oil filter? :D


No, a coffee filter... :)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:17 pm
by ozimax
Actually, I was intending to buy a quality filter down the track but I don't think I'll bother, the lens hood does a good job.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:25 pm
by Reschsmooth
ozimax wrote:
Matt. K wrote:ozimax
Perhaps it was an oil filter? :D


No, a coffee filter... :)


Single or double? Actually, the LM filters generally have a pretty even hole distribution, from what I understand, so you should have been ok. :lol:

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:30 pm
by Yi-P
Reschsmooth wrote:
ozimax wrote:
Matt. K wrote:ozimax
Perhaps it was an oil filter? :D


No, a coffee filter... :)


Single or double? Actually, the LM filters generally have a pretty even hole distribution, from what I understand, so you should have been ok. :lol:


Try a mesh in front of the lens, it turns itself into a "stars" filter... Its fun :lol: