24-120VR - Do you miss the wide angle

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

24-120VR - Do you miss the wide angle

Postby georgie on Mon Feb 07, 2005 7:22 pm

I am hopefully buying my D70 in the next few weeks and was seriously looking at the 24-120VR as my walkabout lens. To people who have the lens, do you find you are missing out on not having the wider angle?

I came from a film with a 28-200 and really enjoyed the convenience of one lens. I have 7 month old twin girls so most of my photos at the moment are of them, so it is handheld, indoor often in poor light. I am sure the VR lens will be a huge help in these conditions, but my other choise is landscape photography and I am worried that I will miss a 28 mm equiv too much?

Any thoughts?

Cheers Georgie
User avatar
georgie
Member
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Runcorn, Brisbane

Postby digitor on Mon Feb 07, 2005 7:46 pm

When I first got my D70, I sorely missed not having anything wider than the kit lens! My 24mm got a fair bit of use on my film bodies. I've solved that problem now though, with a 12-24 Sigma.

I guess though, that you are the only one who can answer this question...

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby gstark on Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:07 pm

Losing the wide end was my biggest cncern when buying the 24-120VR. That was in August, and I've missed the wide end maybe once since then.

Not an issue.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:36 pm

georgie

Like you I take a lot of landscapes and, yes, I miss the wide end, but it is MORE than made up for by the VR benefits.

Of course LL got me and I have bought a 12-24 Nikon specifically for the wide end. When $$$ permit this is probably what you should do too, but if I had it all over again I'd definitely start with the 24-120 VR as my first lens rather than the kit lens.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby georgie on Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:59 pm

Thanks for all the info - everything in life is a compromise - seems like the advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this case vs the kit lens.
User avatar
georgie
Member
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Runcorn, Brisbane

Flash and lenses

Postby georgie on Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:00 pm

Thanks for the info - I am going to try and have a play with both lenses tommorow and then finalize my decision.

Some more questions though - I am planning on getting the SB800 in a few months time.

1) Will the flash work better with any one lens (24-120VR or 18-70)
2) If I get the VR, does that mean I won't need to use the external flash as often?

Cheers
Georgie
User avatar
georgie
Member
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Runcorn, Brisbane


Return to General Discussion

cron