Lens for overseas travel

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lens for overseas travel

Postby Aszental on Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Hey.
well im goin overseas for a year to study, im gonna be doing a lot of hiking and want to be able to take photos of the landscape and scenery.

At the moment i have
17-70mm Sigma 2.8
50mm 1.8 Canon lens.

I will also be doing alot of street photography.

Would these lens be sufficient?, what others lenses should i look into?

Thank you
Aszental
Member
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Caulfield Melbourne

Postby Kris on Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:15 pm

Having travelled for nearlly 3months only last week I can tell you what I took and used alot.

Full frame 5D
16-35 (used this about 65% of the time)
Fast low light lens, 35 F1.4L in my case. Your 50 1.8 would be good if you don't mind shots that are a bit longer. I used this lens only at night as I didn't want to carry a tripod/flash. I used this alot!

70-200 F2.8 IS, long zoom with a tele. Didn't use this too much and you could do without it if you want to travel light. When I did need it (sports games, portraits from a far) it was invaluable.

In my opinion and if budget allows, take a wide angle such as your 17-70, a fast wide prime for night shots and a long zoom. This gives you great coverage, no need for tripods and flexibility during the day with your wide zoom (this doesn't need to be fast but your F2.8 will do wonders)

Hope that helps
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby Aszental on Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:17 pm

Using 30d btw.

Yep it sure does, more opinions i get the better!
Aszental
Member
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Caulfield Melbourne

Postby Kris on Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:19 pm

In that case, add a 70-200 F4 to your arsenal if you dont mind the extra baggage and your set! if you're a bit richer, the f2.8 IS is nice and you'll get a bit more reach cause of the 30D's 1.6x multiper
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby christiand on Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:53 pm

Hi,

I just returned from a trip to Germany.
The two lenses I used were a 12-24mm and a 28-70mm.
Most of the time I used the 28-70mm but sometimes that wasn't wide enough and the 12-24mm helped a lot.
I had the 70-200mm plus tele converter with me, however I never used the long focus.

HTH,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby BT*ist on Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:25 am

For the all-important kilos-to-usage tradeoff, I tend to sacrifice my back and travel with too many lenses. The wide zoom and a nice prime are must-haves. I personally find a lengthier telephoto to be quite useful (eg 70-300) for zooming in on buildings from hilltop or high-rise vantagepoints.

For landscape and scenery and street photography, you might have pretty good coverage with what you have.
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:59 am

Kris wrote:Having travelled for nearlly 3months only last week...


Wow - you have really mastered the art of time compression!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sorry - had to pick that one up!
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Kris on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:12 am

Reschsmooth wrote:
Kris wrote:Having travelled for nearlly 3months only last week...


Wow - you have really mastered the art of time compression!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sorry - had to pick that one up!
 LOL :)
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby gstark on Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:55 am

Kris wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote:
Kris wrote:Having travelled for nearlly 3months only last week...


Wow - you have really mastered the art of time compression!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sorry - had to pick that one up!
 LOL :)


I lived for three years in Modesto, California, one weekend.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Aszental on Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:54 pm

Excellent, thanks so much guys.

Now one more Question.

i have about 300-400 to spend on a Tripod/head, what is something that is relatively small and lightweight that i could take with me? Not goin to be doing so much backpacking over there, so it doesnt have to be tiny!

Thank you
Aszental
Member
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Caulfield Melbourne

Postby christiand on Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:25 pm

Hi Aszental,

what would you like to use the tripod for ?
Reason I'm asking is that allthough I've got two tripods, I hardly use them. My tripods (were $250 without decent head) are not allways of the sturdiness I need and I also found that in a number of situations, like indoors I can get away with placing the camera on some something. A sturdy, reliable, long lasting tripod, that can also take rough terrain with a great ball head will cost far more, I believe, than your budget that you have indicated. Also carrying a tripod around is not much fun.
A believe that a little bean bag (heat pad) may help a lot.

Just my 20 cents,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby benhoskin on Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:02 pm

even look at going wider on the 30d if your taking buildings/landscapes.
i took 30D with a 17-40f4l... still not wide enough!
benhoskin
Newbie
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:26 pm
Location: OCONNOR PERTH

Postby Aszental on Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:57 am

mmm so its between a 10-22mm for the Wider shots, or a 70-200 for the telephoto.

Thanks guys!
Aszental
Member
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Caulfield Melbourne

Postby Kris on Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:01 am

Youll use the 10-20 more than a 70-200 for your trip I'll bet my $
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:24 pm

I tend to agree with Kris. Having just spent 5 weeks overseas myself.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby benhoskin on Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:27 pm

yep the 17-40 was my widest lens, the 70-200 was used probably less than 10%
benhoskin
Newbie
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:26 pm
Location: OCONNOR PERTH


Return to General Discussion

cron