Sigma 17-70 backfocus?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Sigma 17-70 backfocus?

Postby Aszental on Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:18 pm

Hey i just shot this and i was wondering if the experts can take a look at it ;)

Shot at 70mm, F4.5, 1/125s

Image


What do you think, is it an issue?

Thank you!
Aszental
Member
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Caulfield Melbourne

Re: Sigma 17-70 backfocus?

Postby gstark on Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:36 pm

Aszental wrote:Hey i just shot this and i was wondering if the experts can take a look at it ;)



They'll be back in .... about three months. Can you wait? :)

What do you think, is it an issue?


My personal belief is that 99.9999% of so-called back-focus issues come down to just one cause - operator error.

Usually that translates to poor technique, which might mean a poor understanding of how the camera works, or how it might work in a given situation.

Ferinstance, I took my bright shiny new 30D out for a play last night - first time - and I'm not at all happy with the results. Focus is soft. Colours aren't how I like 'em. Exposure is all over the shop. I was shooting my D200 by its side, and results from that camera make an interesting comparison - super sharp, colour is great, exposure is where I like it ....

What's really interesting is that at first glance (chimping only - I've not yet moved the images to a calibrated system) the super-high ISO images from the Canon seem to be noiser than those from the Nikon.

Is any of this disappointing to me?

Not in the slightest - it's an expected outcome. Until I learn the nuances of the Canon, and how to take advantage of its features (and I'm still at the bottom of a very steep learning curve with the D200, mind you) then this is exactly what I believe I should be seeing.

I think that too many people take the learning curves for granted .....

But please feel free to disagree.

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:47 pm

Not a problem :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Onyx on Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:19 pm

Well I had BF issues with my D70, consistently replicated using every which means of focus testing available at the time, so I'm less inclined to agree with Gary. Though I do believe half the cases of backfocus is down to user error.

In this case, going from the sample posted, it seems to be only ~10mm off from 'ideal', which is within tolerance IMHO. Plus the fact that you've tested it now, and are aware of it - means you can then compensate for it shooting in real situations.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Aszental on Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:38 am

Thanks guys, here is another shot i took.

Image

If i bought the lens from HK, would i have to send it back to HK to get calibrated? IS there anywhere in Australia i could do it?

Thanks
Aszental
Member
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Caulfield Melbourne

Postby Onyx on Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:33 pm

That second shot looks quite familiar - like how I remember my 18-70DX to look on the D70.

IIRC, Sigma's AU distro are PhotoContinental or some other outfit in the sunshine state...
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au


Return to General Discussion