Insurance - how to value

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Insurance - how to value

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:24 am

We have been collecting a fair bit of Bronica gear (two lenses, metered prism finder, two film backs, etc). The second hand price paid is one thing, but how would you recommend we value the items for the purposes of listing on our contents insurance?

I could probably go to Borges or someone and get an appraised value (which could be quite generous), or I could use the RRP prices from the Tamron site (which would probably increase the value by a multiple between 5 & 10).

Thoughts (put down on the keyboard) would be appreciated. :D

Thanks
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: Insurance - how to value

Postby jamesw on Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:29 am

does your insurance company provide new for old replacement?

- if yes, provide replacement cost. ie rrp.

what do they require as proof of purchase?

- many insurance companies will just require a photo of your kit.
- some may require you to have your gear appraised.

long story short, give them a call (anonymously, do not give them your details) and ask them what you should do.

it's all good and well to do what you think is the right thing now, but it would suck the proverbial if in a few years time you make a claim and they don't payout because you messed something up.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby phillipb on Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:45 am

With Bronica out of business you may not be able to get new for old anyway so they would probably pay out an agreed sum. Insure for what you think you would like to get back if something happens.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:49 am

Thanks guys. Pending confirmation of the policy (yeah, Phillip - no new for old for Bronica!) I will opt for an appraised value - I will get the appraisal first to make sure it is above what I paid for it!
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby moz on Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:07 pm

Just make sure that whoever does the appraisal is acceptable to the insurance company. You don't want to go with someone who only accepts "valuations" from some dodgy pawnbroker.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby michael_ on Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:28 pm

perhaps just depreciate the value of the item over 5 years, i just had to work out depreciation of my camera gear and we did it over 5 years
User avatar
michael_
Senior Member
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: alexandria, sydney, nsw, au

Postby MSF on Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:21 pm

I have worked in the Insurance industry for the past 19 years now, and whilst I am sure everyone on here means well in what they say, unfortunately they *MAY* be misleading you and that may cause you a few problems come claims time..

The best advice I can offer is CALL YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY !!
- Find out what THEY want - that way, you can be assured that you do it properly in a way that they will be happy with. Also, you will be able to discuss with you the best type of cover that is available, and maybe even how to save some money

As a GENERAL rule however... there are generally TWO types of policies available.. - 1. Replacement - (eg, New for Old) or 2. Indemnity - (eg, Depreciation). Each policy has their benefits for certain people..

This is what i would reccomend..
Catalog EVERYTHING - include make model and serial number
Photograph Everything, individual or as a group.
As for valuations - if you have the original receipt - Perfect - it not only proves the item existed, but proves YOU owned it and when you bought it.

If you do not have the receipts, and the items are no longer available new - then take the catalog and photos to a camera store (with credibility) and ask them to give you a valuation (either as a 'next-closest-model' if it is no longer available, or as a 'street-value' or 'cost-to-replace' based on second hand values) - Eg, a D60 would have a street value of (say) $250, where as the replacement would be a 400D or 40D's list price. How you are settled comes down to how your policy operates..

Make sure you include everything, Bags, spare batteries, lense / sensor cleaners, loupes, stofens etc - EVERYTHING...

Michael,
DSLR Cameras, like most high technology based items depreciate much more rapidly than that... - a 5 year old D60 for example was about $5,000 new, but would be worth $250 at most nowadays... Laptops for example are given a realistic life of about 2.0 years..
User avatar
MSF
Member
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:41 pm

Thanks for the info guys - definately worth a call to the insurer and then a call to their competitors!
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby jamesw on Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:06 am

May i suggest Allianz for a good policy and competitive quote. I myself use them, it costs me about $30 a month, and as a part of my policy i am covered for accidental damage on any of my gear, up to value $2000 and for a total of $7500 per claim. A nice touch :D
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby MSF on Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:21 pm

James,
Check your policy wording - ESPECIALLY if you use your camera gear for ANY business purposes...

Business use photographic equipment is not covered...

See pages 36 & 37
http://www.allianz.com.au/internet/alli ... +03.07.pdf
User avatar
MSF
Member
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:34 pm

Thanks for the info MSF!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9


Return to General Discussion