Nikon Capture 4.2

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Nikon Capture 4.2

Postby kipper on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:14 pm

Hi, I've downloaded Nikon Capture 4.2 and decided to put it's batch processing through it's paces. Something I've noticed quick smart is that this application hasn't been stress tested much at all. After processing about 200 NEFs it starts getting numerous failures mainly due to the fact that this application has a seriously memory leak when batch processing. My PC is installed with 1gb of paired 512mb Corsair XMS memory and has like 10gb free for virtual. Yet it runs out of virtual memory while batch processing. Seems like they do a lot of memory allocating but hardly any freeing of memory once it has processed an image. I really feel sorry for the people who purchased this program.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby birddog114 on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:21 pm

I run with 2Gb memory and allocated one full SATA 250Gb for virtual memory on another Hdd, I have no problems, Corsair XMS memory or other third party products are not difference in this type of works. I tried Corsair XMS before and did not see the difference, perhaps are good for overlocking and game PC.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby kipper on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:27 pm

Yeah, gaming is one of my other hobbies :0

Perhaps it works ok with 256gb of spare space but seriously you shouldn't need that amount of virtual because as it's processed one image it should free up the memory however it's not.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby birddog114 on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:29 pm

kipper wrote:Yeah, gaming is one of my other hobbies :0

Perhaps it works ok with 256gb of spare space but seriously you shouldn't need that amount of virtual because as it's processed one image it should free up the memory however it's not.


Hdd space and its prices are not an issue so why should we bother! Even with above in PSCS, they have the wing :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby MattC on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:31 pm

Kipper,

I noticed this in NC 4.0 and 4.1 also. I have held off on calling this a memory leak in previous posts – it is not really. NC simply does not seem to free the memory properly. I find that after I have processed 20 or so images that I need to shut NC down to free memory properly. So far, I am having a good run with 4.2. Sure, this problem still exists, but the improvements in other areas make it worthwhile.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby phillipb on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:34 pm

I've noticed a similar problem, even without batch processing, the computer gets progressively slower with every photo I process.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby birddog114 on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:38 pm

phillipb wrote:I've noticed a similar problem, even without batch processing, the computer gets progressively slower with every photo I process.


Yes, it's and depend on how much memory do you have in your PC same as virtual
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby phillipb on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:43 pm

I have 512mb but I don't have that problem with Photoshop and I don't think the old version of NC was like that.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby birddog114 on Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:45 pm

phillipb wrote:I have 512mb but I don't have that problem with Photoshop and I don't think the old version of NC was like that.
 PS behave difference with NC, 512mb is just for fun with NC :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby kipper on Sun Feb 13, 2005 10:08 pm

NC feature wise is good, but it's memory management is pos. Seriously memory management is 1st year compsci stuff and they shouldn't be releasing it with something this bad.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby stubbsy on Sun Feb 13, 2005 10:20 pm

Guys I'd have to agree. NC sucks big time in memory management and like MattC says it's been there a while. I take the same action as already covered and do a quit & restart of NC when it starts to slow. I'm a programmer. If I wrote something that ate memory like this does and couldn't fix it I'd quit the profession. Freeing memory / garbage collection is a snack to program in any modern programming language.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Sun Feb 13, 2005 10:26 pm

Yep that's what I'm reduced to doing Stubbsy, limitting my process to say maybe 200 photos with 10gb of virtual memory free. Think it's eating about 2-4gb of virtual and won't free up until I close down NC. I have 3200 photos to process from my trip to JPEG, once I have them in JPEG I can quickly just go through and determine if they're keepers or put in the holding pile. What should of been a start and leave for a few hours process has been complicated by poor programming.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby stubbsy on Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:08 pm

kipper

If all you want to do is convert from NEF to jpeg have a look at ThumbsPlus. It can read NEF and its what I use to batch convert NEF to jpeg. It's no NC replacement, more a Nikon View replacement, but It may solve your problem.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to General Discussion