I love the 70-200 2.8 VR, but I'd like more reach plus the price leaves me cold. Similarly, I love the reach (and price) of the 80-400 VR, but would prefer AF-S and maybe a slightly better maximum aperture.
What I would like to see is a (approx) 100-300 VR f4 AF-S lens. I would imagine they could probably knock one up for about the cost of the 70-200 2.8 VR. Slightly smaller maximum aperture (cheaper to produce) but about the same zoom ratio of the 70-200. It would go lovely with the 1.4TC giving 420mm at an acceptable f5.6.
But then again, what would I know, I'm just a dumb shmuck with money burning a hole in his pocket that could be in the pocket of the Nikon Corporation








 
 

 
 

 The inscrutable Master Birddog has twice this week made similar predicitions. Velly Interlesting..........
   The inscrutable Master Birddog has twice this week made similar predicitions. Velly Interlesting..........  
