Low Light Question.Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Low Light Question.Hey-hey.
Just curious as to why some shots turn out like this under certain lighting: It looks like he's been hit with a can of spray paint.. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
I'm guessing it's UV lighting?
Canon 30D | Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 24mm f/1.4L | Canon Speedlite 430EX | Canon Powershot G9
gallery.miliux.com
Are you using Auto White Balance?
Because it looks like your camera might have picked the wrong one, or as I did the other day, the setting I used reacted completely different to the light as I suspected. Some of the coloured lights maybe giving the same sort of errors. Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
No, this is not "low light" but "bad light"
What settings were in use when you made this image please? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Hey guys:
D70, Manual, RAW, f2.8, 1/80, ISO 800, Auto WB, 125mm, VR. Lighting was crud, as usual. There was good light for a second every once in a while which is when I tried to shoot. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Looks like the lighting style changed as you pressed the shutter.
As I understand it, the D70 (and for that matter, most DSLRs) read the exposure, including WB while the mirror is still down. There is a small but real delay between that reading and the actual exposure. This is generally fine, but in rapidly changing lighting conditions, it can lead to significant errors. As you shot RAW, you may be able to recover using an OOC adjustment Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
As the lighting is constantly changing, I'd turn off AWB and manually set it (after experimenting) to a setting like Shady or Cloudy daylight (dont know what it is in Nikon) and do the whole shoot at that setting so all the effects lighting are taken with the same camera balance corections.
Will take a few shots to see which setting looks realistic, but at least all the lights should be consistant. Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
I'd actually offer similar advice, but unqualified. I have rarely seen a case for using AWB, and in any sort of difficult situation, manual WB - and a constant exposure setting too, probably - is usually the way to go. As Greg points out, the lighting is constantly changing, and while under those sorts of circumstances it might seem as if AWB is the correct approach, the problem is that for every different lighting setup you'll get a different wb setting, and your images (and the resulting pp task) will end up like a lottery. And just like a lottery, you're not going to come out the winner. When you set a manual WB, you'll give yourself - and your images - a common base from which they can be viewed. And PP'd. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for the advice, all. I shall do some experimenting in the near future...
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|