Why do my JPG's look different in PS (against those in IE)?
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:52 am
Hi
I mentioned this problem in a post a while ago, and Stubbsy was kind enough to post a link for a solution. Unfortunately this didn't seem to work for me, so if any one else can help...
When I open a NEF file in NC or PS it looks as I'd expect it to look, if I save it (either with or without profile embedded, both sRGB and Adobe RGB) as a JPG and open it in IE/Windows Picture Viewer/Firefox etc etc it looks much lighter (as if its over exposed). I've tried saving it as a BMP, incase its the JPG format, but the same happens.
If I re-open the dodgy JPG in Photoshop it looks ok again, and matches the NEF file.
All very frustrating!
My post showing the ship on the Tyne (here) shows how light the images go, the original NEF and subsequent PSD are far more vibrant and colourful than this washed out effort.
Can anyone offer any solutions?
(If it helps I can post a link to the PSD file)
CC
I mentioned this problem in a post a while ago, and Stubbsy was kind enough to post a link for a solution. Unfortunately this didn't seem to work for me, so if any one else can help...
When I open a NEF file in NC or PS it looks as I'd expect it to look, if I save it (either with or without profile embedded, both sRGB and Adobe RGB) as a JPG and open it in IE/Windows Picture Viewer/Firefox etc etc it looks much lighter (as if its over exposed). I've tried saving it as a BMP, incase its the JPG format, but the same happens.
If I re-open the dodgy JPG in Photoshop it looks ok again, and matches the NEF file.
All very frustrating!
My post showing the ship on the Tyne (here) shows how light the images go, the original NEF and subsequent PSD are far more vibrant and colourful than this washed out effort.
Can anyone offer any solutions?
(If it helps I can post a link to the PSD file)
CC